Privacy: Difference between revisions

From Internet Law Program 2011
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 57: Line 57:


===Privacy and Technological Points of Control===
===Privacy and Technological Points of Control===
* John Borland, [http://news.cnet.com/Supreme-Court-rules-against-file-swapping/2100-1030_3-5764135.html “Supreme Court rules against file swapping”], June 2005
* John Borland, [http://news.cnet.com/Supreme-Court-rules-against-file-swapping/2100-1030_3-5764135.html “Supreme Court rules against file swapping”], CNET, June 2005
* Dan Goodin [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/07/internet_explorer_do_not_track/ “Microsoft unveils 'do not track' option for IE9”], December 7 2010
* Dan Goodin [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/07/internet_explorer_do_not_track/ “Microsoft unveils 'do not track' option for IE9”], theregister.co.uk, December 7 2010


===Privacy and Reputation===
===Privacy and Reputation===
* Craig Newmark, [http://www.cnewmark.com/2010/04/trust-and-reputation-systems-redistributing-power-and-influence.html "Trust and reputation systems: redistributing power and influence], April 6, 2010
* Craig Newmark, [http://www.cnewmark.com/2010/04/trust-and-reputation-systems-redistributing-power-and-influence.html "Trust and reputation systems: redistributing power and influence], craigconnects blog, April 6, 2010
* Evlyn Rusli, [http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/19/unvarnished-honestly-kazanjy-funding/ "Unvarnished Becomes Honestly.com, Raises $1.2 Million And Opens The Floodgates"], October 19, 2010
* Evlyn Rusli, [http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/19/unvarnished-honestly-kazanjy-funding/ "Unvarnished Becomes Honestly.com, Raises $1.2 Million And Opens The Floodgates"], TechCrunch, October 19, 2010
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Seigenthaler_Sr._Wikipedia_biography_controversy Wikipedia Entry on the Seigenthaler Incident]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Seigenthaler_Sr._Wikipedia_biography_controversy Wikipedia Entry on the Seigenthaler Incident]


==Related Case Examples==
==Related Case Examples==

Revision as of 10:23, 16 August 2011

iLaw Wiki Navigation
Pillar Themes of iLaw
Open Systems/Access · Online Liberty and FOE
The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity · Intellectual Property
Digital Humanities · Cooperation · Privacy
Cross-sectional Themes of iLaw
The History of the Internet
The Global Internet · Interoperability
The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies
The Future of the Internet
Case Studies
Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries
Exploring the Arab Spring · Minds for Sale
User Innovation · Mutual Aid
Misc
Program Schedule · Program Logistics
Evening Events · Student Projects · Participation
Old iLaw Videos · Mid-Point Check-in

Overview

Wednesday, 4:00-5:30pm
Format: Lecture, featuring guest respondents
Lead: John Palfrey, featuring Herbert Burkert
Participants: Urs Gasser, Phil Malone, Charlie Nesson, and others

This pillar topic, led by John Palfrey and featuring Herbert Burkert, will cover a mixture of privacy history, theory, black letter law, regulatory developments and current controversies. Herbert Burkert will offer a multinational perspective of privacy law and policy, outlining the emergence of data protection law in Europe. Against this backdrop, recent global privacy developments, comparative EU vs. US approaches and current online controversies – including behavioral targeting, persistent cookies and Do Not Track legislation; the right to be forgotten/ le droit à l’oubli; location privacy; facial recognition; contextual privacy; Google’s Street View service, and Google’s Buzz rollout – will be explored to gain a deeper understanding of the current the state of privacy law and norms and possible ways forward. Participants Urs Gasser, Phil Malone, and Charlie Nesson will add their perspectives on these issues throughout this session.

Required Readings

Overview

Behavioral Targeting/Do Not Track

Right to Be Forgotten

Location Privacy

Google Street View

Google Buzz

Recommended Readings

Privacy and Technological Points of Control

Privacy and Reputation

Related Case Examples