Message Containing Symbol ERHC (Environmental Remediation Holding Corp.)

>  >  >   spam works: evidence from stock touts and corresponding market activity

View this message on its own page

Jump to the first occurrence of the symbol

Jump to the index of occurrences of this symbol

Clicking on a highlighted symbol will jump to the next highlighted occurrence of the symbol.


-+-+-+- NEXT SEGMENT -+-+-+-
Segment of length 8285
From redacted@cybernothing.org Fri Apr 19 22:36:20 2002
From: redacted@Nil.nil
Subject: [email] [stock kiting] : Emerging Growth Alert
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.sightings
Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.email
Organization: VeriMod ()
User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-980818 ("Laura") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/2.2.7-19980825-SNAP (i386))
Message-ID: <redacted@nntp2.nac.net>
Lines: 75
Approved: redacted@cybernothing.org
Processed-By: Bob the NANAS ModBot <redacted@cybernothing.org>
Verimod-Status: Fri Apr 19 22:36:20 2002 - posted
X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP news.admin.net-abuse.sightings
iD8DBQE8wOI0v1i8LqUfqQURAoMAAJwNJw7VWDIeC12J8WLvtaWqSniAwwCfZCOQ
wBtlzrk+XxeeljSz3BaFEUk=
=9tE5
X-Group-Homepage:
X-Mail-Path: redacted@unagi.cybernothing.org!chi6-1.relay.mail.uu.net!nntp2.nac.net!redacted@nntp2.nac.net
X-Modbot: Bob the NANAS ModBot <redacted@cybernothing.org>
X-Original-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 23:36:14 -0400
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: inch.com
X-Original-Path: shell.inch.com!Spamless
X-Original-To: redacted@moderators.isc.org
X-Poster-Trace: nntp2.nac.net 1019273774 inch.com (19 Apr 2002 23:36:14 -0400)
X-Submissions-To: redacted@cybernothing.org

RELAYED BY: mail server at IP address 12.102.20.130
The HELO is invalid (it does not resolve).
The rDNS which does resolve to the IP address 12.102.20.130 is:
130.muaaa.cmbr.bstma01r1.dsl.att.net. has address 12.102.20.130

[whois.abuse.net]
redacted@att.net (for att.net)

SPAM FROM: mail server at IP address 61.153.9.24
This IP address has no rDNS.
Registry: whois.apnic.net
inetnum: 61.153.9.0 - 61.153.9.255
netname: XIAOSHAN-EDU-NET
descr: XIAOSHAN EDUCATION NETWORK
descr: Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province
country: CN
admin-c: GS118-AP redacted@163.net

======================================================

To redacted@att.net:

Your customer at 130.muaaa.cmbr.bstma01r1.dsl.att.net
(IP address 12.102.20.130) is claiming to be server1.shore.net
(apparenty inaccurately) and is having problems with his open server
which is serving up fried spam.
-------------------------------

To redacted@163.net:

Spam from your IP address 61.153.9.24.

============================================================================

[ORIGINAL SPAM: I have converted angle brackets to square brackets so this
does not affect HTML enabled mail or news readers]

Return-Path: <redacted@excite.com>
Received: from server1.shore.net ([12.102.20.130])
by xxx (8.12.2/8.12.2/xxx) with ESMTP id g3JIIxYu022102
for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:19:00 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <redacted@xxx>
X-Spam-Envelope: "550 Mail from "12.102.20.130" refused by blackhole site relays.ordb.org"
Received: from smtp0231.mail.yahoo.com (61.153.9.24 [61.153.9.24]) by server1.shore.net with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
id J1AF3YKJ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:17:26 -0400
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 02:21:23 +0800
From: redacted@excite.com
X-Priority: 3
CC: xxx
Subject: Emerging Growth Alert
Mime-Version: 1.0
xxxContent-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UIDL: 46fea4dc5263f755bc348ca329623585
Status: RO
X-Status:

[P][B][center]SP[!--of school--]ECI[!--and that--]AL SI[!--was oh so--]TUA[!--bad--]TION ALERTS NEWSLETTER HOT PI[!--everywhere that--]CK OF THE YEAR[/FONT][/B][/P]
[STRONG]Environmental Remediation Holding Corp. [/STRONG][/FONT]
[br][STRONG](d.b.a. Chrome Energy Corp) (OT[!--hello world--]CB[!--sally world--]B:
ERHC)[BR][/STRONG][/FONT][/P][/center][P][STRONG]RECENT PRICE: $.20[BR][BR]SELL TARGET: $1.25[/STRONG][BR][/FONT][/P][P][FONT face3DArial][STRONG]INVE[!--just in--]STORS: WE HAVE FOUND THE HIDDEN GEM: (OT[!--mary had a little lamb--]C[!--its fleece was white as snow--]BB: ERHC) [/STRONG]The IMF (International Monetary Fund) states in a world[!--time for--]wide published report [February 2002 IMF Country Report No. 02/30 (page 10 of 82)] that ERHC's working interest in their offshore West African oil blocks
will generate $[!--for christmas--]1,446,800,000 in cumulative income over the next 22 years.[br][br][center]The IMF provides this evaluation to its 183 Member Nations while promoting international monetary exchange and fostering economic trade and growth with an arsenal of $[!--we come--]272 Billion![/center][br][br][STRONG]Do[!--home--]w Jones Ne[!--and we--]ws:[/STRONG] ERHC enters into joint-ven[!--eat the--]ture license agreements with [b]Schlumberger LTD (NY[!--mistletoe--]SE: SLB, $53)[/b] and [b]B
a
er Hughes, INC. (NYS[!--and stand--]E: BHI, $34)[/b] for seismic data on some of the ric[!--under the--]hest offshore oil blocks in West Africa, where [STRONG]ERHC controls a huge[/STRONG] working interest.[br][br][strong]In[!--coconut--]vest[!--jack be--]or Al[!--nimble--]ert:[/strong] ERHC's joint-venture with SCHLUMBERGER and BAKER HUGHES puts them in world class company with these leaders in oil exploration and reservoir imaging services. The involvement of SLB and BHI reinforces the MULTI-BILLION DOLL
[!--jack be--]AR VALUE that has been placed in this offshore drilling haven. ERHC's goal is to maximize shar[!--jump over--]eholder va[!--the--]lue from existing contra[!--candlestick--]ctual rights, making them a significant player in this region. [/FONT][P][B]THE BIG MO[!--mary went--]NEY ROLLS IN: [/B]The seismic data from this joint venture is being made available for further involvement by the LARGE[!--once upon--]ST OIL COMPANIES IN THE WORLD over the next 2 weeks! Bidding wars have alread
y
developed between major oil companies such as: SHELL, CHEVRON/TEXACO, CONOCO, EXXON/MOBIL, PHILIPS, and MARATHON who are willing to pay Hundreds of Mill[!--a time--]ions to drill in the oil blocks that border on ERHC's offshore zones.[BR][BR][B]ST[!--the lamb--]OCK SET TO EX[!--hello world--]PLODE ON EAR[!--was sure to go--]NINGS BOOM:[/B] "UPSTREAM", the International Oil and Gas Newspaper considered to be the equivalent of the "Wall Street Journal" for the Oil Industry, has stated in a number of articles
that EXXON/MOBIL believes that the oil blocks "housing ERHC's working interest" contain over 8 BILLION BARRELS OF RECOVERABLE OIL[BR][BR][B]TA[!--which made--]KEOVERS RUN[!--to school one day--]NING RAMPANT: [/B]Oil Companies of all sizes have been the target of significant merg[!--ther was--]ers and takeov[!--a prince--]ers during the past year. Many of these tak[!--he lived--]eovers or bu[!--in a--]youts have occurred due to the value of the acquired Company's offshore oil holdings in West Africa.
O
e such example is Marathon Oil (NYS[!--land far--]E: MRO, $28) paying $900 MILLION for the West African holdings of CMS Energy (N[!--away--]YSE: CMS, $23). We believe that ERHC and/or the Company's offshore oil interests could be the next target of a takeove[!--he had--]r. This is largely because of their exclusive right to participate in exploration and production along with OIL INDUSTRY GIANTS, as these oil blocks are adjacent to Billion Barrel producing regions![BR][BR][b]Global St[!--a princess--]ock P
articipation - [/b]On March 27, 2002--Chrome Energy Corporation ("Chrome") (OTCBB:ERHC), announced that its common s[!--and sh--]tock has been approved for listing on the Berlin Stoc[!--was very--]k Exchange in Germany. The Berlin St[!--beautiful--]ock Exchange is the leading stoc[!--one day--]k exchange in Europe for dual listings with over 6,000 American companies listed. Chrome's common stock began trading on March 28, 2002[br][br][center][b]Special Situation Alerts' Newsletter offer
s
valuable research for serious investors with our Hot Pi[!--the end--]ck Of The Year - ERHC[/b][/BODY][/html]

--
All postings to news.admin.net-abuse.sightings are unconfirmed and
unverified unless stated otherwise by the moderators. All opinions
expressed above are considered the opinions of the original poster,
not the moderators or their respective employers.

For a copy of the guidelines to this group, see:


-+-+-+- NEXT SEGMENT -+-+-+-
Segment of length 8276
From redacted@cybernothing.org Fri Apr 19 22:36:20 2002
From: redacted@Nil.nil
Subject: [email] [stock kiting] : Emerging Growth Alert
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.sightings
Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.email
Organization: VeriMod ()
User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-980818 ("Laura") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/2.2.7-19980825-SNAP (i386))
Message-ID: <redacted@nntp2.nac.net>
Lines: 75
Approved: redacted@cybernothing.org
Processed-By: Bob the NANAS ModBot <redacted@cybernothing.org>
Verimod-Status: Fri Apr 19 22:36:20 2002 - posted
X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP news.admin.net-abuse.sightings
iD8DBQE8wOI0v1i8LqUfqQURAoMAAJwNJw7VWDIeC12J8WLvtaWqSniAwwCfZCOQ
wBtlzrk+XxeeljSz3BaFEUk=9tE5
X-Group-Homepage:
X-Mail-Path: redacted@unagi.cybernothing.org!chi6-1.relay.mail.uu.net!nntp2.nac.net!redacted@nntp2.nac.net
X-Modbot: Bob the NANAS ModBot <redacted@cybernothing.org>
X-Original-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 23:36:14 -0400
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: inch.com
X-Original-Path: shell.inch.com!Spamless
X-Original-To: redacted@moderators.isc.org
X-Poster-Trace: nntp2.nac.net 1019273774 inch.com (19 Apr 2002 23:36:14 -0400)
X-Submissions-To: redacted@cybernothing.org

RELAYED BY: mail server at IP address 12.102.20.130
The HELO is invalid (it does not resolve).
The rDNS which does resolve to the IP address 12.102.20.130 is:
130.muaaa.cmbr.bstma01r1.dsl.att.net. has address 12.102.20.130

[whois.abuse.net]
redacted@att.net (for att.net)

SPAM FROM: mail server at IP address 61.153.9.24
This IP address has no rDNS.
Registry: whois.apnic.net
inetnum: 61.153.9.0 - 61.153.9.255
netname: XIAOSHAN-EDU-NET
descr: XIAOSHAN EDUCATION NETWORK
descr: Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province
country: CN
admin-c: GS118-AP redacted@163.net

=====================================================To redacted@att.net:

Your customer at 130.muaaa.cmbr.bstma01r1.dsl.att.net
(IP address 12.102.20.130) is claiming to be server1.shore.net
(apparenty inaccurately) and is having problems with his open server
which is serving up fried spam.
-------------------------------

To redacted@163.net:

Spam from your IP address 61.153.9.24.

===========================================================================[ORIGINAL SPAM: I have converted angle brackets to square brackets so this
does not affect HTML enabled mail or news readers]

Return-Path: <redacted@excite.com>
Received: from server1.shore.net ([12.102.20.130])
by xxx (8.12.2/8.12.2/xxx) with ESMTP id g3JIIxYu022102
for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:19:00 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <redacted@xxx>
X-Spam-Envelope: "550 Mail from "12.102.20.130" refused by blackhole site relays.ordb.org"
Received: from smtp0231.mail.yahoo.com (61.153.9.24 [61.153.9.24]) by server1.shore.net with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
id J1AF3YKJ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:17:26 -0400
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 02:21:23 +0800
From: redacted@excite.com
X-Priority: 3
CC: xxx
Subject: Emerging Growth Alert
Mime-Version: 1.0
xxxContent-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UIDL: 46fea4dc5263f755bc348ca329623585
Status: RO
X-Status:

[P][B][center]SP[!--of school--]ECI[!--and that--]AL SI[!--was oh so--]TUA[!--bad--]TION ALERTS NEWSLETTER HOT PI[!--everywhere that--]CK OF THE YEAR[/FONT][/B][/P]
[STRONG]Environmental Remediation Holding Corp. [/STRONG][/FONT]
[br][STRONG](d.b.a. Chrome Energy Corp) (OT[!--hello world--]CB[!--sally world--]B:
ERHC)[BR][/STRONG][/FONT][/P][/center][P][STRONG]RECENT PRICE: $.20[BR][BR]SELL TARGET: $1.25[/STRONG][BR][/FONT][/P][P][FONT face3DArial][STRONG]INVE[!--just in--]STORS: WE HAVE FOUND THE HIDDEN GEM: (OT[!--mary had a little lamb--]C[!--its fleece was white as snow--]BB: ERHC) [/STRONG]The IMF (International Monetary Fund) states in a world[!--time for--]wide published report [February 2002 IMF Country Report No. 02/30 (page 10 of 82)] that ERHC's working interest in their offshore West African oil blocks
will generate $[!--for christmas--]1,446,800,000 in cumulative income over the next 22 years.[br][br][center]The IMF provides this evaluation to its 183 Member Nations while promoting international monetary exchange and fostering economic trade and growth with an arsenal of $[!--we come--]272 Billion![/center][br][br][STRONG]Do[!--home--]w Jones Ne[!--and we--]ws:[/STRONG] ERHC enters into joint-ven[!--eat the--]ture license agreements with [b]Schlumberger LTD (NY[!--mistletoe--]SE: SLB, $53)[/b] and [b]B
a
er Hughes, INC. (NYS[!--and stand--]E: BHI, $34)[/b] for seismic data on some of the ric[!--under the--]hest offshore oil blocks in West Africa, where [STRONG]ERHC controls a huge[/STRONG] working interest.[br][br][strong]In[!--coconut--]vest[!--jack be--]or Al[!--nimble--]ert:[/strong] ERHC's joint-venture with SCHLUMBERGER and BAKER HUGHES puts them in world class company with these leaders in oil exploration and reservoir imaging services. The involvement of SLB and BHI reinforces the MULTI-BILLION DOLL
[!--jack be--]AR VALUE that has been placed in this offshore drilling haven. ERHC's goal is to maximize shar[!--jump over--]eholder va[!--the--]lue from existing contra[!--candlestick--]ctual rights, making them a significant player in this region. [/FONT][P][B]THE BIG MO[!--mary went--]NEY ROLLS IN: [/B]The seismic data from this joint venture is being made available for further involvement by the LARGE[!--once upon--]ST OIL COMPANIES IN THE WORLD over the next 2 weeks! Bidding wars have alread
y
developed between major oil companies such as: SHELL, CHEVRON/TEXACO, CONOCO, EXXON/MOBIL, PHILIPS, and MARATHON who are willing to pay Hundreds of Mill[!--a time--]ions to drill in the oil blocks that border on ERHC's offshore zones.[BR][BR][B]ST[!--the lamb--]OCK SET TO EX[!--hello world--]PLODE ON EAR[!--was sure to go--]NINGS BOOM:[/B] "UPSTREAM", the International Oil and Gas Newspaper considered to be the equivalent of the "Wall Street Journal" for the Oil Industry, has stated in a number of articles
that EXXON/MOBIL believes that the oil blocks "housing ERHC's working interest" contain over 8 BILLION BARRELS OF RECOVERABLE OIL[BR][BR][B]TA[!--which made--]KEOVERS RUN[!--to school one day--]NING RAMPANT: [/B]Oil Companies of all sizes have been the target of significant merg[!--ther was--]ers and takeov[!--a prince--]ers during the past year. Many of these tak[!--he lived--]eovers or bu[!--in a--]youts have occurred due to the value of the acquired Company's offshore oil holdings in West Africa.
O
e such example is Marathon Oil (NYS[!--land far--]E: MRO, $28) paying $900 MILLION for the West African holdings of CMS Energy (N[!--away--]YSE: CMS, $23). We believe that ERHC and/or the Company's offshore oil interests could be the next target of a takeove[!--he had--]r. This is largely because of their exclusive right to participate in exploration and production along with OIL INDUSTRY GIANTS, as these oil blocks are adjacent to Billion Barrel producing regions![BR][BR][b]Global St[!--a princess--]ock P
articipation - [/b]On March 27, 2002--Chrome Energy Corporation ("Chrome") (OTCBB:ERHC), announced that its common s[!--and sh--]tock has been approved for listing on the Berlin Stoc[!--was very--]k Exchange in Germany. The Berlin St[!--beautiful--]ock Exchange is the leading stoc[!--one day--]k exchange in Europe for dual listings with over 6,000 American companies listed. Chrome's common stock began trading on March 28, 2002[br][br][center][b]Special Situation Alerts' Newsletter offer
s
valuable research for serious investors with our Hot Pi[!--the end--]ck Of The Year - ERHC[/b][/BODY][/html]

--
All postings to news.admin.net-abuse.sightings are unconfirmed and
unverified unless stated otherwise by the moderators. All opinions
expressed above are considered the opinions of the original poster,
not the moderators or their respective employers.

For a copy of the guidelines to this group, see:



Index of Symbols Found

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Note that this number of occurrences may not match the number of occurrences of this symbol listed elsewhere in this database. This is because the symbol counts used elsewhere were generated with a more advanced algorithm that identified more symbols and also ignored identical segments of the same message.