View this message on its own page
Jump to the first occurrence of the symbol
Jump to the index of occurrences of this symbol
Clicking on a highlighted symbol will jump to the next highlighted occurrence of the symbol.
-+-+-+- NEXT SEGMENT -+-+-+-
Segment of length 35566
From redacted@cybernothing.org Fri Jun 4 10:27:50 2004
Message-ID: <redacted@failed.com>
From: Scuba Steve <redacted@yahoo.com>
Subject: [email] Newsletter #3171
X-No-Confirm: yes
Approved: redacted@cybernothing.org
Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.email
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.sightings
Organization: VeriMod (
Processed-By: Bob the NANAS ModBot <redacted@cybernothing.org>
Verimod-Status: Fri Jun 4 10:27:50 2004 - posted
X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP news.admin.net-abuse.sightings
iD8DBQFAwJT2v1i8LqUfqQURAhDHAJ0dYFMrRdTsOQ4tE81sww0RjIc1fwCeJa3N
D7ED6v1NrWunLfftd6pseP0=
=bpFl
X-Group-Homepage: http://www.killfile.org/~tskirvin/nana/
X-Mail-Path: horus.isnic.is [UNTRUSTED]!failed.com [UNTRUSTED]!redacted@yahoo.com
X-Modbot: Bob the NANAS ModBot <redacted@cybernothing.org>
X-Original-Cc: The Feds <redacted@ftc.gov>
X-Original-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 15:27:51 -0000
X-Original-To: NANAS <redacted@moderators.isc.org>
X-Submissions-To: redacted@cybernothing.org
NOTE: This message is the result of web or usenet address harvesting.
Addresses are created dynamically for address harvesters by Seed
Spambots: http://freshmeat.net/projects/seedspambots/
Since NANAS postings are unmunged, it is also possible that this address
was harvested from usenet.
On Fri Jun 4 15:27:51 2004 -0000 a message was received from
68.53.38.18 (United States) which said HELO as pcp04289102pcs.liztwn01.ky.comcast.net
and left the following turdlet for all to see:
Received: from [68.53.38.18] (HELO pcp04289102pcs.liztwn01.ky.comcast.net) (68.53.38.18)
by ScubaSteve with SMTP; Fri Jun 4 15:27:51 2004 -0000
X-Message-Info: TVOXhVK42sBGv/jKpMJmgSnBpVrkPl9Y
Received: from stirling-n13.come.aol.com ([32.88.120.93]) by dp4-n81.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824);
Fri, 04 Jun 2004 22:22:36 +0500
From: Tameka Snow <redacted@hushmail.com>
To: redacted@123webhosting.org
Subject: Newsletter #3171
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 16:27:36 -0100 EST
Message-ID: <redacted@carolyn-u14.aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--7911754865500082356"
----7911754865500082356
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
|
rder-width: medium"> SPE
le=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">^CIAL
| |||||||
|
rder-width: medium"> This URGE+N<= FONT style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">;T IN#= VESTOmR ZE: 1px">: B*ULLETIN h NT-SIZE: 1px">Yas beue tyle=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">!n s(= eunf<= /font>t oXu 1px">6t! t T-SIZE: 1px">;o oDur x">/ mXil SIZE: 1px">[lion-s of subsc s IbM ">{McE E: 1px">-DI<A ONT-SIZE: 1px">.TmELY to = a/llo= Dw=3D inv SIZE: 1px">%estco "FONT-SIZE: 1px">Arsz t(he x">, oppoFr T-SIZE: 1px">Ttun_i e=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">'ty t"o = acc{u= &mulate a suHbs px">ytavnti T-SIZE: 1px">'al po!sition s>t ">'ock. I/ns NT-SIZE: 1px">sta(P e=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">?ay SJy<= FONT style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">Zstems, >! I]nc.. SIZE: 1px">_ (otcbb: IPYS) is the lMatest new= pic-k, set to r NT-SIZE: 1px">ceall:y mo fu1tu px">}re. This coqmp e=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">danyG d<= FONT style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">=3Des+= ervUes your imWme px">idpiat -SIZE: 1px">'e attegn yle=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">>tpion= .t Sto >Zck Mu>le TePa x">hm fo'und a new wi yle=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">5nneOr= g y^<= /font>et agazin! SIZE: 1px">^ | |||||||
| rder-width: medium"> | |||||||
rder-width: medium">
| |||||||
| rder-width: medium"> | |||||||
|
rder-width: medium"> INSTAP= %AY=20S9YST T-SIZE: 1px">{E.MS =3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">Z Hixghli 1px">2ghQt T-SIZE: 1px">Ts und-color: #ffffff" face=3D"Arial" color=3D"#000000" size=3D"3" FAMILY=3D"= SANSSERIF" PTSIZE=3D"12" BACK=3D"#ffffff"> N;O COMPETITION= - IPYS is the fi2r NT-SIZE: 1px">~st^ and only transacti{o ONT-SIZE: 1px">Tn procexss to enablet Internet Mercha style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">NnSt= sL to a ">Vccept ATM% car "FONT-SIZE: 1px">&d ("PINU" de "FONT-SIZE: 1px">obiit) payme= nts - T:hi 1px">Us i|s a m$ul x">[ti(b IZE: 1px">`il`lion market cur= rVenz= tUly, a ZE: 1px">,nwd the f[aste 1px">+st groOwing segment of = t#h><= /font>e transac_tion processing} industry. =3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">$ Onlin? font>e credit1 c SIZE: 1px">Eard and eklectronic che NT-SIZE: 1px">Zc%k =3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">C puErcha= ses tota-led more than $9 =3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">(0 Billion in the US iMn 2 le=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">L003.b<= br> MerchaUnts ZE: 1px">( pay onl#y a tyle=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">N fixv >e5ds= fee per trakn px">Gsaction foWr PI le=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">&N deKb= it tra!nsacti E: 1px">Oon3s ONT-SIZE: 1px">X, as ovppose 1px">"d to th*e "FONT-SIZE: 1px">( way cr:e tJransactions ar ONT-SIZE: 1px">[e cAurr style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">*entl+ t>y pro^cesse E: 1px">Ud,' as a percen|tage IZE: 1px">$ o=3Df th le=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">Me dol<= lar amount oCf t SIZE: 1px">9he transactihons. "FONT-SIZE: 1px">w MeUrc t!rans 1px">&actfio NT-SIZE: 1px">yn< pro yle=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">Jceses= ing fees pTaid to VISA, MC an tyle=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">od other cHredi SIZE: 1px">dt card com=3Dp IPYS dev)e ZE: 1px">+loped the encrypted pro[ font>c`e x">ossi2ng -SIZE: 1px">] sSystem ena IZE: 1px">Dbl<ing the yle=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">S us<e= oOf ATM x">j cards over the INnterne : 1px">yt and owns the8 p the gateway se&rvice "FONT-SIZE: 1px">| for deTliv= erWi3= nug thi ZE: 1px">cs! se}rv px">Pice oYv NT-SIZE: 1px">/erQ t le=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">.hce In= &tJ font>e`r x">pnet. The Company has already identified several x">J major crecdit card transa "FONT-SIZE: 1px">7ction pro[c= esxsi= Xng provind T-SIZE: 1px">Bers that are vio%lat ONT-SIZE: 1px">-ing. the Com<= FONT style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">4pany's patent and IPYS i0s : 1px">} fili[ng s =3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">Leveral ct >ivi\l law sui ZE: 1px">[ts tyo collecmt the tens FONT-SIZE: 1px">^ ofN million= s due the Compa6ny b ONT-SIZE: 1px">vy s!o ">Wme of th.e ONT-SIZE: 1px">' b:iggest na<= FONT style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">Nmes in the proc IZE: 1px">kessi]ng busineNss E: 1px">E. Mxany large chain store le=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">< mer0c= [han= %ts ar~e IZE: 1px">n o+p ">6t;ing to l ONT-SIZE: 1px">YoTw e=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">rer the;= ir electronic toransaction SIZE: 1px">! pErocessi tyle=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px"><ng costs by offer 1px">5ihng T-SIZE: 1px">: PIN$ debit p SIZE: 1px">day]ment solutions= to ccustomers. IZE: 1px">` In Febrpuar= y 20N04 Wal- ZE: 1px">`M'art "FONT-SIZE: 1px">0 (NYSE':WM<= FONT style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">pT) began x">* refusing MaasterCard IZE: 1px">n signat$ure tyle=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">` debit cards and 1px">c requ-ires "FONT-SIZE: 1px">} c+ustome : 1px">;rs toh enter their P<= FONT style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">sIN number, savin SIZE: 1px">4g the chain tenBs IZE: 1px">P ofL millions t:h ">Oe patenzts to t =3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">%his proces. nt>s t~h x">Dat Walmar>t "FONT-SIZE: 1px">a's processors a/re usi "FONT-SIZE: 1px">\ng. EBAY (NdAS ZE: 1px">dDAQ:EBAY") acq PayPal for 1.5 BilUlion tied the= m int_o d px">)irec't T-SIZE: 1px">h debit procesqs T-SIZE: 1px">Cin|g for EBAY p= .urchase x">As thi,s year. Djire FONT-SIZE: 1px">)ct Debit processing i ">~s expec0t NT-SIZE: 1px">Aed to a}c ">*countd for 45= % o!f all transac -SIZE: 1px">|ti"ons b yle=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">xy 2005.7 nt> I1PY x">$S patents% will allow the= < coE= mpa{ny t IZE: 1px">Oo li\te px">prahlly own t "FONT-SIZE: 1px">Ahi]s market= . Thei S 1px">*tock MuOle Team can't ict a longP te : 1px">2rZm target f le=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">8o&r I<= FONT style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">5Pj ont>Y!S because no o ONT-SIZE: 1px">Ine knows what wi-ll happen w tyle=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">]hen II t>PY}S signs its nex ONT-SIZE: 1px">?t sevieral l ZE: 1px">:argeV n "FONT-SIZE: 1px">Catio~n to its tr8an SIZE: 1px">vsactionSs pro systvem. Thi SIZE: 1px">js s0t "FONT-SIZE: 1px">jock could4 = skkyro >Fcket9 to $10.00 over>nig : 1px">5hbt T-SIZE: 1px">-;{ and then exp= lode be$yon 1px">;d o2ur wild~e 1px">*st d,reams! "FONT-SIZE: 1px">k Thank y=3D<= /font>o`u f 1px">[or yo,ur Trust and Keep the Faith The St3ock Mu= le T/e >#a\m | |||||||
| rder-width: medium"> | |||||||
|
rder-width: medium"> This prof~ile i= s not wi*thout b SIZE: 1px">*ias, and is a paid rel:eas SIZE: 1px">=3De. Writears and= maile#rs have be -SIZE: 1px">`en comp,ensate IZE: 1px">\d for! the di infojrmation SIZE: 1px">| on behalf& of on= e oPr more of the co.mpan 1px">~ies mentione\d yle=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">E in tt >his release. ParPt NT-SIZE: 1px">.ies involv#ed in the ONT-SIZE: 1px">! creation and disI font>t]ri px">Nbution of this pkrofi 1px">^le h7ave been e=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">z c{ompe= ns<ated 40, 1px">Q00'0 dollars by a t"hird IZE: 1px">F party (2third par= ty),\ who is : 1px">r nonaffiliated, fXor se e=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">+rvices providy= ed irnc ZE: 1px">Cluding diEss px">'eminta T-SIZE: 1px">&tion of company? > i)nfo ">6rm$ati SIZE: 1px">ion in th-is release. PR and ot yle=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">-her individ+= uals a=3Dnd ot FONT-SIZE: 1px">Bher creators a1nd mailer "FONT-SIZE: 1px">)s of this letter will sell all ofz its o -SIZE: 1px">]riBg "FONT-SIZE: 1px">'inal share&= s during the di)stribut ZE: 1px">Lion of th>i yle=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">\se pr= Jofile >?. Pa?r IZE: 1px"><tieps i~nv x">Xolved may imme8diately se= l+l som ">\e or any sh[ares in a prof5i 1px">1led$ c NT-SIZE: 1px">joVmpany held b= y profiWl px">\ec crea NT-SIZE: 1px">*tors anAd may hZave previously sold shares= in a profil<ed com NT-SIZE: 1px">aplany held by PR Individujals involved. Our= Optin mailinmg se>rv px">}ices) f NT-SIZE: 1px">!or a compa+n s2tock 1px">^ pricye ONT-SIZE: 1px">w to increase, in which ev 1px">-ent involved parties woulRd make "FONT-SIZE: 1px">| a profit when it sells its stock in the company. In addition, our selling o= :f a company stock may ha've a ne "FONT-SIZE: 1px">6gat!ive e of the? s E: 1px">,toc%k. The e=3D"FONT-SIZE: 1px">$ pasAt = pNrofile x">.s are o_nly the winnercs not all of our recommen= dat_ions |
----7911754865500082356--
--
All postings to news.admin.net-abuse.sightings are unconfirmed and
unverified unless stated otherwise by the moderators. All opinions
expressed above are considered the opinions of the original poster,
not the moderators or their respective employers.
For a copy of the guidelines to this group, see:
-+-+-+- NEXT SEGMENT -+-+-+-
Segment of length 9040
From redacted@cybernothing.org Fri Jun 4 10:27:50 2004
Message-ID: <redacted@failed.com>
From: Scuba Steve <redacted@yahoo.com>
Subject: [email] Newsletter #3171
X-No-Confirm: yes
Approved: redacted@cybernothing.org
Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.email
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.sightings
Organization: VeriMod (
Processed-By: Bob the NANAS ModBot <redacted@cybernothing.org>
Verimod-Status: Fri Jun 4 10:27:50 2004 - posted
X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP news.admin.net-abuse.sightings
iD8DBQFAwJT2v1i8LqUfqQURAhDHAJ0dYFMrRdTsOQ4tE81sww0RjIc1fwCeJa3N
D7ED6v1NrWunLfftd6pseP0=bpFl
X-Group-Homepage: http://www.killfile.org/~tskirvin/nana/
X-Mail-Path: horus.isnic.is [UNTRUSTED]!failed.com [UNTRUSTED]!redacted@yahoo.com
X-Modbot: Bob the NANAS ModBot <redacted@cybernothing.org>
X-Original-Cc: The Feds <redacted@ftc.gov>
X-Original-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 15:27:51 -0000
X-Original-To: NANAS <redacted@moderators.isc.org>
X-Submissions-To: redacted@cybernothing.org
NOTE: This message is the result of web or usenet address harvesting.
Addresses are created dynamically for address harvesters by Seed
Spambots: http://freshmeat.net/projects/seedspambots/
Since NANAS postings are unmunged, it is also possible that this address
was harvested from usenet.
On Fri Jun 4 15:27:51 2004 -0000 a message was received from
68.53.38.18 (United States) which said HELO as pcp04289102pcs.liztwn01.ky.comcast.net
and left the following turdlet for all to see:
Received: from [68.53.38.18] (HELO pcp04289102pcs.liztwn01.ky.comcast.net) (68.53.38.18)
by ScubaSteve with SMTP; Fri Jun 4 15:27:51 2004 -0000
X-Message-Info: TVOXhVK42sBGv/jKpMJmgSnBpVrkPl9Y
Received: from stirling-n13.come.aol.com ([32.88.120.93]) by dp4-n81.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824);
Fri, 04 Jun 2004 22:22:36 +0500
From: Tameka Snow <redacted@hushmail.com>
To: redacted@123webhosting.org
Subject: Newsletter #3171
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 16:27:36 -0100 EST
Message-ID: <redacted@carolyn-u14.aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--7911754865500082356"
----7911754865500082356
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
SPECIAL
| |||||||
This URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN has been sent out to our millions of subscribers IMMEDI substantial position in this great stock. InstaPay Systems, Inc.. (otcbb: IPYS) is the latest newpick, set to really move in near future. This company deserves your immediate attention. Stock Mule Team found a new winner yet again! | |||||||
| |||||||
INSTAPAY=20SYSTEMS Highlights NO COMPETITION- IPYS is the first and only transaction processing production system to enable Internet Merchants to accept ATM card ("PIN" debit) payments - This is a multibillion market currently, and the fastest growing segment of the transaction processing industry. Online credit card and electronic check purchases totaled more than $90 Billion in the US in 2003. Merchants pay only a fixed fee per transaction for PIN debit transactions, as opposed to the way cred1t card transactions are currently processed, as a percentage of the dol transaction< processing fees paid to VISA, MC and other credit card companies. IPYS developed the encrypted processing system enabl the gateway service for delivering this service over the Internet. The Company has already identified several major credit card transaction processing providers that are violating the Company's patent and IPYS is filing several civil law suits to collect the tens of millions due the Company by some of the biggest names in the processing business. Many large chain store< merchants are opting to lower their electronic transaction processi 2004 Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) began refusing MasterCard signature debit cards and requires customers to enter their PIN number, saving the chain tens of millions annually. IPYS owns the patents to this process that Walmart's processors are using. EBAY (NASDAQ:EBAY) acquisition of PayPal for 1.5 Billion tied them into direct debit processing for EBAY purchases this year. Direct Debit processing is expected to account for 45% of all transactions by 2005. IPYS patents will allow the< company to literally own this market. The Stock Mule Team can't predict a long term target for IPYS because no one knows what will happen when IPYS signs its next several large nationally based chain stores to its transactions processing system. This stock could skyrocket to $10.00 overnight; and then explode beyond our wildest dreams! Thank you for your Trust and Keep the Faith The Stock Mule Team | |||||||
This profile is not without bias, and is a paid release. Writers andmailers have been compensated for the dissemination of company information on behalf of one or more of the companies mentioned in this release. Parties involved in the creation and distribution of this profile have been compens nonaffiliated, for services provided including dissemination of company information in this release. PR and other individuals and other creators and mailers of this letter will sell all of its original shares during the distribution of this profile. Par profiled company held by profile creators and may have previously sold sharesin a profil services for a company may cause the company stock price to increase, in which event involved parties would make a profit when it sells its stock in the company. In addition, our selling of a company stock may have a negative effect on the market price of the stock. The past profiles are only the winners not all of our recommendations |
----7911754865500082356--
--
All postings to news.admin.net-abuse.sightings are unconfirmed and
unverified unless stated otherwise by the moderators. All opinions
expressed above are considered the opinions of the original poster,
not the moderators or their respective employers.
For a copy of the guidelines to this group, see:
Index of Symbols Found
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Note that this number of occurrences may not match the number of occurrences of this symbol listed elsewhere in this database. This is because the symbol counts used elsewhere were generated with a more advanced algorithm that identified more symbols and also ignored identical segments of the same message.