Compliance Committee - Revision history

Joe.andrieu: Undo revision 4386 by Jessica (Talk)

2010-08-07T03:08:19Z

Undo revision 4386 by Jessica (Talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:08, 7 August 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	* VRM practices could be clustered, for example, into:		* VRM practices could be clustered, for example, into:

	* [http://www.superiorpapers.com/ research papers]

	- Individual (user)-centrism		- Individual (user)-centrism

Jessica at 09:08, 5 August 2010

2010-08-05T09:08:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:08, 5 August 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	* VRM practices could be clustered, for example, into:		* VRM practices could be clustered, for example, into:

			* [http://www.superiorpapers.com/ research papers]

	- Individual (user)-centrism		- Individual (user)-centrism

Iain at 20:49, 5 May 2008

2008-05-05T20:49:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:49, 5 May 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:
	- 5 answer options (ranging from 'never heard of this practice = 0 to 'yes we do this and can prove it' = 100%)		- 5 answer options (ranging from 'never heard of this practice = 0 to 'yes we do this and can prove it' = 100%)

	- detailed compliance text explaining the practice and issues around it ~~in detail~~		- detailed compliance text explaining the practice and issues around it

	* VRM practices could be clustered, for example, into:		* VRM practices could be clustered, for example, into:

Iain at 17:24, 5 May 2008

2008-05-05T17:24:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 5 May 2008
Line 35:		Line 35:

	The score also becomes a published reputation with a reputation/ compliance mark provided. We'd run a white list (VRM compliant) and a black list (were compliant but are no longer so) with the bit in between being 'pending assessment'.		The score also becomes a published reputation with a reputation/ compliance mark provided. We'd run a white list (VRM compliant) and a black list (were compliant but are no longer so) with the bit in between being 'pending assessment'.


	2) We establish an entity that owns the VRM Compliance and Benchmarking Program, which could be Berkman, could be hosted by the Liberty Alliance or could be a new entity. This is a key step and obviously feeds into the VRM Organisation work stream.		2) We establish an entity that owns the VRM Compliance and Benchmarking Program, which could be Berkman, could be hosted by the Liberty Alliance or could be a new entity. This is a key step and obviously feeds into the VRM Organisation work stream.


	3) We make the VRM Compliance/ Benchmarking assessment available in two forms.		3) We make the VRM Compliance/ Benchmarking assessment available in two forms.


	a) a face to face assessment of large organisations which we'd outsource to organisations which specialise in assessing and from which the entity above would earn revenues (a % of the assessment charge).		a) a face to face assessment of large organisations which we'd outsource to organisations which specialise in assessing and from which the entity above would earn revenues (a % of the assessment charge).


	b) a 'lite touch' self-assessment variant typically for smaller businesses/ non-profits.		b) a 'lite touch' self-assessment variant typically for smaller businesses/ non-profits.


	4) Over time, and as VRM applications and standards emerge, we develop a complementary technical compliance program in which applications are physically tested to ensure compliance to a specific, pre-agreed technical standard.		4) Over time, and as VRM applications and standards emerge, we develop a complementary technical compliance program in which applications are physically tested to ensure compliance to a specific, pre-agreed technical standard.


	Hope that helps give a flavour of what we have in mind.		Hope that helps give a flavour of what we have in mind.

Iain at 17:23, 5 May 2008

2008-05-05T17:23:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:23, 5 May 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:

	* VRM practices could be clustered, for example, into:		* VRM practices could be clustered, for example, into:


	- Individual (user)-centrism		- Individual (user)-centrism


	- ability to generate a 'win-win' for buyer and seller		- ability to generate a 'win-win' for buyer and seller


	- approach to personal information (portability etc)		- approach to personal information (portability etc)


	- use of open standards		- use of open standards


	- overall transparency of service offering		- overall transparency of service offering


	This would allow a 'VRM index' score to be generated at overall level, for each subject area, and for each individual practice. These scores then drive compliance (e.g. scores below 35% are non-compliant, scores below 65% are 'pending and scores 65 and above are compliant). They also drive benchmarking, i.e. to what extent is my application VRM compliant, which in turn drives improvement activity and the consulting/ services activities that go along with that.		This would allow a 'VRM index' score to be generated at overall level, for each subject area, and for each individual practice. These scores then drive compliance (e.g. scores below 35% are non-compliant, scores below 65% are 'pending and scores 65 and above are compliant). They also drive benchmarking, i.e. to what extent is my application VRM compliant, which in turn drives improvement activity and the consulting/ services activities that go along with that.

Iain.Henderson at 14:21, 1 April 2008

2008-04-01T14:21:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:21, 1 April 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The objective of the Compliance Committee is to		The objective of the Compliance Committee is to
	'''Create and oversee VRM compliance program'''		'''Create and oversee VRM compliance program'''

			The background to this proposal is that we suspect that, over time, applications or organisations may claim to be 'VRM' practitioners, but not in fact be so (i.e. they do not comply with one or more of the core principles). As such, we wish to have ways and means of limiting the impact of these false claims.

	Our proposal is that:		Our proposal is that:

Iain.Henderson at 14:17, 1 April 2008

2008-04-01T14:17:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:17, 1 April 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	1) We develop a series of statements of good/ best practice in the areas that define VRM (see below *), build those into a process through which organisations can be assessed on a five point scale. Each statement would have to be 'owned' by a VRM expert and would include:		1) We develop a series of statements of good/ best practice in the areas that define VRM (see below *), build those into a process through which organisations can be assessed on a five point scale. Each statement would have to be 'owned' by a VRM expert and would include:

	- the statement itself		- the statement of good practice itself (e.g. data within a VRM application will be portable).

	- 5 answer options (ranging from 'never heard of this practice = 0 to 'yes we do this and can prove it' = 100%)		- 5 answer options (ranging from 'never heard of this practice = 0 to 'yes we do this and can prove it' = 100%)

	- detailed compliance text explaining the practice and issues around it in detail		- detailed compliance text explaining the practice and issues around it in detail

Iain.Henderson at 21:01, 30 March 2008

2008-03-30T21:01:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 30 March 2008
Line 21:		Line 21:

	The score also becomes a published reputation with a reputation/ compliance mark provided. We'd run a white list (VRM compliant) and a black list (were compliant but are no longer so) with the bit in between being 'pending assessment'.		The score also becomes a published reputation with a reputation/ compliance mark provided. We'd run a white list (VRM compliant) and a black list (were compliant but are no longer so) with the bit in between being 'pending assessment'.

	An example of the above can be seen at my hobby-horse site, the Trust Index. If you are happy to go down the route that Brett and I propose I am happy that The Trust Index be absorbed into VRM benchmarking (some of the dimensions are relevant as is the assessment infrastructure), or at worst learned from.

	2) We establish an entity that owns the VRM Compliance and Benchmarking Program, which could be Berkman, could be hosted by the Liberty Alliance or could be a new entity. This is a key step and obviously feeds into the VRM Organisation work stream.		2) We establish an entity that owns the VRM Compliance and Benchmarking Program, which could be Berkman, could be hosted by the Liberty Alliance or could be a new entity. This is a key step and obviously feeds into the VRM Organisation work stream.

Iain.Henderson at 20:58, 30 March 2008

2008-03-30T20:58:43Z

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''Create and oversee VRM compliance program'''
-This page will be the central point of organization for the committee.
+Our proposal is that:
-This is a placeholder page, soon to be replaced by committee members.
+) We develop a series of statements of good/ best practice in the areas that define VRM (see below *), build those into a process through which organisations can be assessed on a five point scale. Each statement would have to be 'owned' by a VRM expert and would include:

Joe.andrieu: typo

2008-01-09T07:43:33Z

typo

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:43, 9 January 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	'''Create and oversee VRM compliance program'''		'''Create and oversee VRM compliance program'''

	This is page will be the central point of organization for the committee.		This page will be the central point of organization for the committee.

	This is a placeholder page, soon to be replaced by committee members.		This is a placeholder page, soon to be replaced by committee members.