Difference between revisions of "VRM CRM 2010 Sessions Wiki"

From Project VRM
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Unconference breakout sessions for Day One)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Unconference breakout sessions for Day One
+
Unconference breakout sessions for Day 1
 +
 
 +
Unconference breakout sessions for Day 2
 +
 
 +
'''Notes for the Government Relationship Management (GRM) Session'''
 +
*Q: How do we create citizen ownership of the governance process?
 +
*Q: What is the tragedy of the Netroots?
 +
*Q: How do we get citizens and politicians to engage in a deeper way?
 +
*Q: What could help to bring about deeper citizen engagement resilient and sustainable?
 +
**conversations that lead to smarter policy, minimizing the effect of sound bites and 30-sec TV ads
 +
**positive feedback loops that keep citizens coming back
 +
**clear ways to channel emotion into a solution
 +
**widespread harnessing of tools like SeeClickFix-- geolocation through mobile platforms so citizens can point out deficiencies at a particular location and notify government of problems
 +
**confidence that commenting on a social network can result in action or notification to the appropriate government agency
 +
**easy ways to walk up a ladder of engagement of deeper and more meaningful public participation
 +
**tips/training wheels on how to be more effective as an engaged citizen
 +
**game-like user experiences to make citizenship more engaging (works for some citizens)
 +
**a possible Mechanical Turk for government where a government agency can ask a large number of citizens to take a particular action.  Perhaps this can also be bidirectional where citizens can initiate a request for several government agencies to collaborate on a solving a problem that was identified by citizens and around which large numbers of citizens rallied.

Revision as of 20:15, 27 August 2010

Unconference breakout sessions for Day 1

Unconference breakout sessions for Day 2

Notes for the Government Relationship Management (GRM) Session

  • Q: How do we create citizen ownership of the governance process?
  • Q: What is the tragedy of the Netroots?
  • Q: How do we get citizens and politicians to engage in a deeper way?
  • Q: What could help to bring about deeper citizen engagement resilient and sustainable?
    • conversations that lead to smarter policy, minimizing the effect of sound bites and 30-sec TV ads
    • positive feedback loops that keep citizens coming back
    • clear ways to channel emotion into a solution
    • widespread harnessing of tools like SeeClickFix-- geolocation through mobile platforms so citizens can point out deficiencies at a particular location and notify government of problems
    • confidence that commenting on a social network can result in action or notification to the appropriate government agency
    • easy ways to walk up a ladder of engagement of deeper and more meaningful public participation
    • tips/training wheels on how to be more effective as an engaged citizen
    • game-like user experiences to make citizenship more engaging (works for some citizens)
    • a possible Mechanical Turk for government where a government agency can ask a large number of citizens to take a particular action. Perhaps this can also be bidirectional where citizens can initiate a request for several government agencies to collaborate on a solving a problem that was identified by citizens and around which large numbers of citizens rallied.
Retrieved from "http://cyber.harvard.edu/projectvrm/?title=VRM_CRM_2010_Sessions_Wiki&oldid=4473"