VRM CRM 2010 Sessions Wiki: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Unconference breakout sessions for Day One) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Unconference breakout sessions for Day | Unconference breakout sessions for Day 1 | ||
Unconference breakout sessions for Day 2 | |||
'''Notes for the Government Relationship Management (GRM) Session''' | |||
*Q: How do we create citizen ownership of the governance process? | |||
*Q: What is the tragedy of the Netroots? | |||
*Q: How do we get citizens and politicians to engage in a deeper way? | |||
*Q: What could help to bring about deeper citizen engagement resilient and sustainable? | |||
**conversations that lead to smarter policy, minimizing the effect of sound bites and 30-sec TV ads | |||
**positive feedback loops that keep citizens coming back | |||
**clear ways to channel emotion into a solution | |||
**widespread harnessing of tools like SeeClickFix-- geolocation through mobile platforms so citizens can point out deficiencies at a particular location and notify government of problems | |||
**confidence that commenting on a social network can result in action or notification to the appropriate government agency | |||
**easy ways to walk up a ladder of engagement of deeper and more meaningful public participation | |||
**tips/training wheels on how to be more effective as an engaged citizen | |||
**game-like user experiences to make citizenship more engaging (works for some citizens) | |||
**a possible Mechanical Turk for government where a government agency can ask a large number of citizens to take a particular action. Perhaps this can also be bidirectional where citizens can initiate a request for several government agencies to collaborate on a solving a problem that was identified by citizens and around which large numbers of citizens rallied. | |||
Revision as of 16:15, 27 August 2010
Unconference breakout sessions for Day 1
Unconference breakout sessions for Day 2
Notes for the Government Relationship Management (GRM) Session
- Q: How do we create citizen ownership of the governance process?
- Q: What is the tragedy of the Netroots?
- Q: How do we get citizens and politicians to engage in a deeper way?
- Q: What could help to bring about deeper citizen engagement resilient and sustainable?
- conversations that lead to smarter policy, minimizing the effect of sound bites and 30-sec TV ads
- positive feedback loops that keep citizens coming back
- clear ways to channel emotion into a solution
- widespread harnessing of tools like SeeClickFix-- geolocation through mobile platforms so citizens can point out deficiencies at a particular location and notify government of problems
- confidence that commenting on a social network can result in action or notification to the appropriate government agency
- easy ways to walk up a ladder of engagement of deeper and more meaningful public participation
- tips/training wheels on how to be more effective as an engaged citizen
- game-like user experiences to make citizenship more engaging (works for some citizens)
- a possible Mechanical Turk for government where a government agency can ask a large number of citizens to take a particular action. Perhaps this can also be bidirectional where citizens can initiate a request for several government agencies to collaborate on a solving a problem that was identified by citizens and around which large numbers of citizens rallied.