Blogs: Difference between revisions

From Project VRM
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
* Denise Howell: [http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/09/06/vlfs_should_embrace_vrm.php VLFs should embrace VRM]
* Denise Howell: [http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/09/06/vlfs_should_embrace_vrm.php VLFs should embrace VRM]
* Denise Howell: [http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howell/?p=67 Monetizing the urge to recommend]
* Denise Howell: [http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howell/?p=67 Monetizing the urge to recommend]
* [http://barking.alceste.ch/?p=44 CRM is dead, long live VRM]
* Alceste: [http://barking.alceste.ch/?p=44 CRM is dead, long live VRM]
* Phil Windley: [http://www.windley.com/archives/2006/12/vendor_relationship_matters.shtml Vendor Relationship Matters]
* Phil Windley: [http://www.windley.com/archives/2006/12/vendor_relationship_matters.shtml Vendor Relationship Matters]
* Colin Henderson: [http://bankwatch.wordpress.com/2006/12/08/time-to-rethink-the-basis-of-marketing-data/ Time to rethink the basis of marketing data]
* Colin Henderson: [http://bankwatch.wordpress.com/2006/12/08/time-to-rethink-the-basis-of-marketing-data/ Time to rethink the basis of marketing data]

Revision as of 02:46, 9 December 2006