October 28 2008 Conference Call

From Project VRM
Revision as of 22:31, 28 October 2008 by Khopper (talk | contribs) (Decision)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Topic: R-button working meeting

Attendees

  • Keith Hopper
  • Iain Henderson
  • Dean Landsman
  • Doc Searls
  • Joe Andrieu
  • Charles Andres
  • Asa Hardcastle
  • Christopher Carfi
  • Drummond Reed

Points

Asa:

  • concerned about the increasing complexity of states. Closing of magnets symbolizing relationship = a relationship action has taken place.
  • There should be two states: one open and one closed

Doc:

  • We need to reach a temporary agreement has two states or more than two states
  • What we don't do: take your money, checkbox, but that's all there is to the relationship ==> don't want this to be replicated on the customer side

Decision

  • There are three states to the r-button: not visible, visible + open, and visible + closed
  • The r-button is not visible if there are no VRM relationship actions available for the user to take on this screen/page
  • The r-button is visible and open if VRM relationship actions are available (with an entity represented on or in the page), but none have been taken by the user
  • The r-button is visible and closed if a user has taken a VRM relationship action associated with a represented entity
  • An r-button will close when a user has taken a relationship action, regardless if the vendor subscribes to the supporting service, or is even aware of VRM
  • An action is a "VRM action" if it is provided by a relationship service that is based on VRM-compliant standards
  • A relationship service based on a VRM-compliant standard must allow a vendor to participate (e.g. reciprocate the user intention)

Follow up

  • More discussion on personal data store