Research Meeting Notes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: == Notes from Meeting on 10/29 == * Before / after with VRM implementations * Self-tracking - what sorts of changes occur * Look at companies that are willing to share info and what change...) |
|||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
** 2nd group: Create basket and share with stores | ** 2nd group: Create basket and share with stores | ||
* Education of customers is an important aspect of example | * Education of customers is an important aspect of example | ||
* Problem with secondary markets, e.g. users aggregating data without vendor buy-in | * Problem with secondary markets, e.g. users aggregating <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.besthappyhour.in/washington/seattle<span style="color:black;font-weight:normal; text-decoration:none!important; | ||
background:none!important; text-decoration:none;">happy hour seattle</span>] | |||
<span class="plainlinks">[http://www.besthappyhour.in/california/los-angeles<span style="color:black;font-weight:normal; text-decoration:none! | |||
important; background:none!important; text-decoration:none;">happy hour los angeles</span>] | |||
<span class="plainlinks">[http://www.besthappyhour.in/new-york/new-york-city<span style="color:black;font-weight:normal; text-decoration:none! | |||
important; background:none!important; text-decoration:none;">nyc happy hour</span>] | |||
<span class="plainlinks">[http://www.besthappyhour.in/new-york/dc<span style="color:black;font-weight:normal; text-decoration:none!important; | |||
background:none!important; text-decoration:none;">happy hour dc</span>] | |||
<span class="plainlinks">[http://www.besthappyhour.in/texas/austin<span style="color:black;font-weight:normal; text-decoration:none!important; | |||
background:none!important; text-decoration:none;">austin happy hour</span>] | |||
<span class="plainlinks">[http://www.besthappyhour.in/oregon/portland<span style="color:black;font-weight:normal; text-decoration:none!important; | |||
background:none!important; text-decoration:none;">portland happy hour</span>] data without vendor buy-in | |||
* LastFM, scrobbling test (e.g. what will people do with their data?) | * LastFM, scrobbling test (e.g. what will people do with their data?) | ||
** What would you pay per song? Then collect data and present it to them, will it change what the song is worth? | ** What would you pay per song? Then collect data and present it to them, will it change what the song is worth? |
Latest revision as of 17:36, 29 August 2011
Notes from Meeting on 10/29
- Before / after with VRM implementations
- Self-tracking - what sorts of changes occur
- Look at companies that are willing to share info and what changes this brings to them
- Game: profiles of companies (mirror existing companies) - users interacting and measuring
- User research around learning perceptions and actions
- How does behavior change when people are ignorant vs. once they understand
- Increase visibility around what users "give away" + then add-in control
- People's willingness to give data with control vs. without control
- Max - existing research: ranked shopping list based on privacy levels
- Can we use real money? Mechanical Turk?
- Testing what people say vs. what they do
- How do we do the "invention is the mother of necessity" aspect of VRM - can we test something that doesn't exist yet?
- Research Hypotheses:
- Will people be more willing to yield their information if they control it?
- How will people behave if we give them more control over/with their data
- Realworld retailer - at checkout, they're given some choices
- give up information in exchange
- How do we test removal of guesswork?
- Turk experiment with movie recommendations
- Test
- 1st group: You have money to buy some movies (simulated stores)
- 2nd group: Create basket and share with stores
- Education of customers is an important aspect of example
- Problem with secondary markets, e.g. users aggregating happy hour seattle
portland happy hour data without vendor buy-in
- LastFM, scrobbling test (e.g. what will people do with their data?)
- What would you pay per song? Then collect data and present it to them, will it change what the song is worth?
- Don't forget about selection bias with these types of experiments
Notes from Workshop on 10/13
Should be...
- testable, concrete, measurable
- of use for doc in his new book
- appease the berkman gods with productive research efforts
- relatively easy and completable with volunteers, internal resources and a limited time-frame
- provide businesses with fodder that they need to help make the case internally for opening up user control
- Ben from Zeo needs a list of benefits to openness to bring to his investors: We need to provide that!
- What are the benefits to vendors of VRM?
- What is user data control? Define.
- Relationships -> what are the vendor benefits?
- eliminate guesswork
For example...
- Talk to organizations who have opened up and have them describe the http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/projectvrm/edit/VRM_Research_opportunitiesbenefits
- What's measurable here?
- Test the hypothesis: A free customer is worth more than a captive one
- "worth more" means defining customer value and measuring it
- is the customer valuing the vendor more?
- what is free vs. captive?
- before and after giving users their data
- altimeter group
- engagementdb.com: report that shows that those who do social media are most profitable
- case studies (e.g. HBS format)
- backward analysis?
- report on personal informatics
- what data comes out of personal informatics?
- Company experiences with launching api's?
- interviews, surveys
- What are some open data efforts?
- VRM spotting -> what are some user-driven organizations?
- What are possible frameworks / scenarios for measurement / testing / research
- What are the intention economy principles?
What is VRMness (user-drivenness?) that might be testable?
- individual is the POI
- individual gets a copy of their data
- individual controls use of data
- users initiate
- user contribution is a core value
- user choice
- belongs to user - user owns / controls the system
- service portability / substitutability