Februrary 20 2008 Conference Call: Difference between revisions
Joe.andrieu (talk | contribs) |
Joe.andrieu (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
===Action Items=== | ===Action Items=== | ||
#Send query on email list about use of main list. Is that working better? - Joe - By Friday Feb 22, 2008 | #Send query on email list about use of main list. Is that working better? - Joe - By Friday Feb 22, 2008 | ||
#First draft position paper - Dean - By Friday Feb 29, 2008. | |||
==Next Meeting== | ==Next Meeting== | ||
[[March 5 2008 Conference Call]] | [[March 5 2008 Conference Call]] | ||
Revision as of 12:57, 20 February 2008
Conference Call Notes
Drafted by Joe Andrieu, February 20, 2008
IRC
- vrm at chat.freenode.net
Other Calls
Attendees
- Joe Andrieu
- Dean Landsman
- Drummond Reed
- Deb Schultz
Previous Action Items
- Forward presentation deck to vision committee - Charles Andres - Feb 6 - Done
- Ping Dean about Vision committee to schedule a meeting about objectives, next steps - Keith Hopper - By Friday Feb 8. - DONE
- Schedule an IP policy discussion - Joe Andrieu - by Friday Feb 8. - Done
- Download components to new CMS website - Charles Andres - by Friday Feb 15. - Done.
- Send out link to notes to steering committee - Joe Andrieu - Feb 6 - Done
Notes
Vision Committee (Dean)
Website CMS is now up. Many thanks to Sean Bohan.
Keith and Dean are looking to put some teeth in that. They'll talk more once Dean is healthier and Keith is back from IMA.
Standards Committee (Joe)
We had the IP conversation. Working outline of Change of Address use. Moved the conversation to the main list.
Organization Committee (Doc)
Need to get Doc to be a bit more proactive. He has mentioned he knows he needs to put more time in and will be making an effort.
Usage Committee (Adriana)
Compliance Committee (Iain)
Events
Open Discussion
Committees seem to have sapped the momentum and no synergy.
Deb suggested using the same time slot (alternating Wednesdays) for committee meetings.
She also suggested that she's not quite sure how we want to describe VRM. So, we err on the side of waiting. But maybe we should just dive in.
Dean seconds that. Some peculiar sense about not being sure how to blog about it. A question of point of reference. Dean has numerous examples, very much Doc's style of talking about things, but that's not Dean's style. So that makes it a bit harder. And there is a part of him that wants to write position papers and such.
Deb points out however, that Chris and Adriana and others have blogged VRMy stuff. But she has some questions about what it means to say "hey that's VRM" in contexts where we see it happen. She has erred on the side of caution.
What do we mean by VRM? We need a second level of a little bit more structure.
Dean suggests that he & Deb put a position piece together. Dean has access to Doc, so we'll run it by him and see if he likes it. Deb says that would be great. And that she's ready to dive in as editor. Dean will take a first draft, an outline.
Action Items
- Send query on email list about use of main list. Is that working better? - Joe - By Friday Feb 22, 2008
- First draft position paper - Dean - By Friday Feb 29, 2008.