Committees: Difference between revisions

From Project VRM
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 29: Line 29:


Adriana Lukas & Chris Carfi & Deb Schultz & Alan Mitchell & Dean Landsman( & Sean Bohan) & Kaliya & Bart Stevens
Adriana Lukas & Chris Carfi & Deb Schultz & Alan Mitchell & Dean Landsman( & Sean Bohan) & Kaliya & Bart Stevens
[[What is to be done?]]


== VRM Compliance Committee == (and Standards? see VRM Requirements and specs)
== VRM Compliance Committee == (and Standards? see VRM Requirements and specs)
Iain Henderson & Brett
Iain Henderson & Brett

Revision as of 05:24, 8 January 2008

Committees are based on goals that have been articulated and agree at the VRM meeting that took place at Google offices in Mountain View, CA on 2nd December 2007.


VRM Vision Committee

Dean Landsman & Doc Searls & Jerry Michalski & Charles Andres & Keith Hopper & Adriana Lukas & Iain Henderson & Deb Schultz & Alan Mitchell


== VRM Requirements and Specs Committee == (and Standards?) Brett & Drummond Reed & Alan & Joe Andrieu & Paul & Iain Henderson

Requirements that came out of a Change of Address Use Case analysis:

  • Address stored independently of any particular vendor
  • Owner of address can choose who stores canonical source
  • Data should be in an open format and portable without data or service loss
  • Data transfer/portability is always under user control
  • Vendors can discover the appropriate service for each user


VRM Organisation Committee

Doc Searls & Brett & Charles Andres & Joe Andrieu Charter process for subgroups see [[1]]


VRM Usage Committee

Adriana Lukas & Chris Carfi & Deb Schultz & Alan Mitchell & Dean Landsman( & Sean Bohan) & Kaliya & Bart Stevens

What is to be done?

== VRM Compliance Committee == (and Standards? see VRM Requirements and specs) Iain Henderson & Brett