Committees: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Hiphopalemi (Talk) to last version by Joe.andrieu) |
Joe.andrieu (talk | contribs) |
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 13:50, 9 December 2009
Committees are based on goals that have been articulated and agree at the VRM meeting that took place at Google offices in Mountain View, CA on 2nd December 2007.
VRM Vision Committee
Dean Landsman & Doc Searls & Jerry Michalski & Charles Andres & Keith Hopper & Adriana Lukas & Iain Henderson & Deb Schultz & Alan Mitchell
VRM Standards Committee
Brett & Drummond Reed & Alan & Joe Andrieu & Paul & Iain Henderson
Requirements that came out of a Change of Address Use Case analysis:
- Address stored independently of any particular vendor
- Owner of address can choose who stores canonical source
- Data should be in an open format and portable without data or service loss
- Data transfer/portability is always under user control
- Vendors can discover the appropriate service for each user
VRM Organisation Committee
Doc Searls & Brett & Charles Andres & Joe Andrieu Charter process for subgroups see [[1]]
VRM Usage Committee
Adriana Lukas & Chris Carfi & Deb Schultz & Alan Mitchell & Dean Landsman & Sean Bohan & Kaliya & Bart Stevens
VRM Compliance Committee
(and Standards? see VRM Requirements and specs) Iain Henderson & Brett