Talk:Relbutton Scenarios: Difference between revisions

From Project VRM
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Some open questions)
 
mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
How might we version the requirements section - what should be built early and be part of 'core'? What might we learn during adoption and usage and let the OS community take forward? Feels like much of this (e.g. the 'reinventing the market' bits) apply to some vendors better than others.[[User:Khopper|Khopper]] 18:32, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
How might we version the requirements section - what should be built early and be part of 'core'? What might we learn during adoption and usage and let the OS community take forward? Feels like much of this (e.g. the 'reinventing the market' bits) apply to some verticals better than others. [[User:Khopper|Khopper]] 18:32, 2 April 2008 (EDT)


How can we use the relbutton to facilitate the breaking down of barriers between consumer and vendor, since that's where the most individually-empowered markets seem to be heading? (e.g., not "this is my half of the button and that's your half of the button")?[[User:Khopper|Khopper]] 18:32, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
How can we use the relbutton to facilitate blurred barriers between consumer and vendor, since that's where the many individually-empowered markets are heading? [[User:Khopper|Khopper]] 18:32, 2 April 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 17:49, 2 April 2008

How might we version the requirements section - what should be built early and be part of 'core'? What might we learn during adoption and usage and let the OS community take forward? Feels like much of this (e.g. the 'reinventing the market' bits) apply to some verticals better than others. Khopper 18:32, 2 April 2008 (EDT)

How can we use the relbutton to facilitate blurred barriers between consumer and vendor, since that's where the many individually-empowered markets are heading? Khopper 18:32, 2 April 2008 (EDT)