Network Neutrality: Difference between revisions
WendySeltzer (talk | contribs) (→Disney) |
WendySeltzer (talk | contribs) (→Google) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Google== | ==Google== | ||
We speak for the users and their freedom. If we can't get neutral net from BT, we'll build our own, because we rely on user content. | |||
==Startup== | ==Startup== | ||
==Government== | ==Government== |
Revision as of 14:16, 24 April 2007
What position do you advocate?
BT
Prioritization. Huge investments in network infrastructure. Because bandwidth is expensive, we need to prioritize, and we want to charge content providers for priority. Disney should pay us if they want to reach our customers faster.
Disney
We're big enough to cut a deal.
We speak for the users and their freedom. If we can't get neutral net from BT, we'll build our own, because we rely on user content.
Startup
Government
Internet is a utility, but bureaucrats aren't always good at regulating utilities. We'll think about it, form a committee and come back in 5 years. (BT sets its lobbyists to work.)
Public interest consumer group
The Internet is a utility. We don't allow Dyson to pay for priority electricity, we shouldn't allow Disney to pay for priority Internet.