Text archives Help


RE: [projectvrm] The marketing/cybercrime symbiosis


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "T.Rob" < >
  • To: "'Doc Searls'" < >
  • Cc: "'Don Marti'" < >, "'ProjectVRM list'" < >, "'Mary Hodder'" < >
  • Subject: RE: [projectvrm] The marketing/cybercrime symbiosis
  • Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:58:48 -0400
  • Authentication-results: mailspamprotection.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=184.154.225.7

Escalating the tech war is a never-ending spiral. I'd much rather put
controls in the browser that qualify for circumvention protection under the
DMCA and then sue the pants of anyone who circumvents them. It may not
solve the problem but as anyone who has ever had stage fright can tell you
people seem less intimidating with no pants.

Kind regards,
-- T.Rob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doc Searls
> [mailto: ]
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 14:47 PM
> To: T.Rob
> Cc: Don Marti; ProjectVRM list; Mary Hodder
> Subject: Re: [projectvrm] The marketing/cybercrime symbiosis
>
> +1 on this thread. Well doing, everybody.
>
> Let's say you (Don, T.Rob or anybody who wants to weigh in) were running
> Mozilla. What would you do to make Firefox (or a "safe" version of it)
> work for us and not for the #adtech and #malvertising mills? And that
> serves our intentions as users and customers, for example by expressing
> *our* terms and policies?
>
> Doc
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.