Re: [projectvrm] Mobile is hitting the nuclear reset button

[Don Marti < >]

Sure, but the Super Bowl as an ad medium was always
the most regulated, high-end, and "curated".  Yes,
the budgets and production values have gone up and up,
but there was never a time when Super Bowl ads were
as low-class as say, email spam, or the Facebook ads
that older women seem to get:
  http://zgp.org/~dmarti/business/facebook-ads/

"Times Square outdoor advertising" is a category that
has gone from skeevy to high-class, but it seems like
a rare exception (that wouldn't have been possible
without the economic and legal changes in the whole
neighborhood, even the whole city).

Don

begin Doc Searls quotation of Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 10:57:04AM -0400:
> 
> There are many distinctions to be made in the advertising business. 
> 
> As for Times Square... I dunno. It might be a cultural attainment of some 
> kind, but it's also an exceptions (bold and flashy electronic billboards) 
> that don't generalize well to the whole category. Another is Super Bowl 
> ads. People go to both so they can witness the best exemples of a category 
> they otherwise ignore or avoid.
> 
> Doc
> 
> On Apr 9, 2014, at 10:46 AM, Jim Bursch 
> <
 >
>  wrote:
> 
> > Some might argue that billboard advertising has attained a higher value 
> > as it has evolved with technology (Times Square comes to mind as another 
> > cultural attainment of advertising). And I suspect that billboards are 
> > the closest thing to a pure "ad medium" -- as opposed to some other 
> > medium to which ads are added. A distinction needs to be made between an 
> > "ad medium" and an "advertising-supported medium."
> > Jim Bursch
> > 310-869-5340
> > 
> > 
 
> > 
> > @jimbursch
> > 
> > On 4/9/2014 7:28 AM, Doc Searls wrote:
> >> I agree, though Vogue may be in a tie with other fashion/specialty 
> >> magazines. The point is that the advertising itself is a kind of 
> >> editorial, and adds value to the whole thing. Brand advertising at its 
> >> best does that.
> >> 
> >> Still don't have an answer for Don's question, though.
> >> 
> >> Doc
> >> 
> >> On Apr 9, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Jim Bursch 
> >> <
 >
> >>  wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> I think of Vogue magazine as the highest cultural attainment of 
> >>> advertising.
> >>> Jim Bursch
> >>> 310-869-5340
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
 
> >>> http://mymindshare.com
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> @jimbursch
> >>> 
> >>> On 4/8/2014 11:44 AM, Don Marti wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> begin Doc Searls quotation of Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:36:20AM -0400:
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> A fun find in the comments:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> <http://crappy-mobile-ads.tumblr.com>
> >>>> Yes, that's great.  (My favorite is the clippable
> >>>> coupon. Yes, just a second while I take a pair of
> >>>> bolt cutters to my phone...)
> >>>> 
> >>>> Advertising history question: has there
> >>>> ever been an ad medium that has gone from
> >>>> crappy/spammy/disreputable to higher value?  Or do
> >>>> ad media get burned through never to recover?
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -----
> >> No virus found in this message.
> >> Checked by AVG - 
> >> www.avg.com
> >> 
> >> Version: 2014.0.4355 / Virus Database: 3882/7320 - Release Date: 04/09/14
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> 

-- 
Don Marti                    
http://zgp.org/~dmarti/