- From: "T.Rob" <
>
- To: "'Don Marti'" <
>, "'Phil Windley'" <
>
- Cc: "'ProjectVRM list'" <
>
- Subject: RE: [projectvrm] Non-disparagement clause
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:38:20 -0500
- Authentication-results: mailspamprotection.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=184.154.225.7
On what grounds would Experian make that call? KlearGear has a contract with
the customer in which stipulated damages are set at $3,500. How can Experian
make a determination that the contract to which they are not a party is
invalid? Isn't there a default assumption that a contract is legal unless it
contains clauses known to conflict with established law or until a court says
otherwise? You or I may feel this is a clear violation of prior restraint
but then so are court gag orders, NDA agreements and lots of other stuff.
I'm guessing Experian would open *themselves* up to liability if they failed
to record the derogatory information form their customer.
Of course, IANAL so I may be waaaaaaay off in left field here.
-- T.Rob
>
-----Original Message-----
>
From: Don Marti
>
[mailto:
]
>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:55 PM
>
To: Phil Windley
>
Cc: ProjectVRM list
>
Subject: Re: [projectvrm] Non-disparagement clause
>
>
begin Phil Windley quotation of Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:03:13AM -0700:
>
>
The real failure here is the credit bureaus. Really, some random company
>
can just "ding" a person, and the
>
credit bureau will spread it around? Sounds like
>
the problem is on Experian's end.
>
>
> Check out this story that just appeared on a local TV station.
>
>
>
> The woman buys something from Kleargear.com, doesn't get it, writes a
>
negative review and several years later gets a legal notice from
>
Kleargear telling her to remove the review or be fined because in their
>
T&Cs they have a "non-disparagement clause".
>
>
>
> "In an effort to ensure fair and honest public feedback, and to prevent
>
the publishing of libelous content in any form, your acceptance of this
>
sales contract prohibits you from taking any action that negatively
>
impacts kleargear.com, its reputation, products, services, management or
>
employees."
>
>
>
> http://m.kutv.com/article?id=12267430/
>
>
>
> And just to show that companies that report on sucky companies can be
>
> sucky in their own way, KUTV apparently has JS in place to prevent me
>
> from copying and pasting from the story. I had to View Source to cut
>
> and paste the preceding quote into this email. :(
>
>
--
>
Don Marti +1-510-332-1587 (mobile)
>
http://zgp.org/~dmarti/ Alameda, California, USA
>
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.