Re: [projectvrm] digital-footprints-the-journey-from-business-intelligence-to-analytics

[Doc Searls < >]

I just went ahead and posted this:

> I would suggest listening to the marketplace on this issue. Here are three 
> links packed with clues:
> 
> http://downloads.pagefair.com/reports/the_rise_of_adblocking.pdf 
> 
> http://qz.com/120797/over-one-fifth-of-people-use-ad-blocking-software-and-its-beginning-to-hurt/
>  
> 
> http://www.google.com/trends/explore?q=adblock#q=adblock&cmpt=q
> 
> I also advise reading what Don Marti has been writing lately: 
> http://zgp.org/~dmarti/ It's strong medicine, but it should make clear how 
> far apart markets and marketing have drifted.

The short URL for the whole thing: http://linkd.in/1i6ms3B

Doc

On Nov 12, 2013, at 11:43 AM, T.Rob 
<
 >
 wrote:

> Here is the response I posted...
> 
> Don't be fooled. It very much *is* about privacy. When surveillance was
> based on atoms, Newtonian physics limited the amount and nature of
> information about you that could be collected without your knowledge.
> Because it was expensive, deep surveillance was only practical against
> selected, high value targets. But today your bit trail can be collected
> continuously, with extremely fine granularity, correlated to your physical
> offline activities, stored indefinitely, and all at an incremental
> per-person cost of near zero.  Anyone who believes this is a difference in
> degree rather than a difference in kind is deluded.  
> 
> We never developed the legal and policy frameworks to deal with panoptical
> surveillance because it has never been possible - up to now.  We ABSOLUTELY
> need to reconsider our legal and policy frameworks in light of the new
> digital capabilities.  Furthermore, time is of the essence because each new
> digital intrusion into our private lives establishes a precedent that will
> be extremely difficult to roll back later.
> 
> Unfortunately, we are more likely to ignore these aspects until the
> consequences are so harmful that they can no longer be convincingly denied.
> This idea that privacy concerns are overblown is the red herring and it's
> starting to stink up the server room.
> 
> ...please feel free to "like" the VRM-friendly replies so they show up in
> the "Popular" tab.  Currently, you have to click on "Newest" just to see
> mine or Tony's.
> 
> -- T.Rob
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: James Pasquale 
>> [mailto:
 ]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:27 AM
>> To: ProjectVRM list
>> Subject: [projectvrm] digital-footprints-the-journey-from-business-
>> intelligence-to-analytics
>> 
>> Anyone up to replying to this one after all it is Geoffery Moore and that
>> is all I'm going to say.
>> 
>> http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20131111183317-110300724-
>> digital-footprints-the-journey-from-business-intelligence-to-analytics
>