| Iain There are plenty of words expended on the VRMProject list extolling the virtues of privacy and freedom from surveillance. But nobody has explained why one should expect privacy or freedom from surveillance to be the norm. Upon what basis can one expect one's dealings to be 'private' amongst the members of the society in which we have chosen to live? Does living in a society inevitably mean that our privacy should be constrained. And how much should privacy be constrained? Upon what basis can one expect one to be 'free from surveillance' by other members of the society in which we live. Is some surveillance necessary e.g. to prevent crime, enforce societal norms and prevent free-riding? If it is, who decides how much and in what forms? Just a thought. Best regards from Cologne, Graham On Sep 21, 2013, at 9:08 PM, Iain Henderson <
">
> wrote: Great idea Kevin, it's a lot easier to play with words and get around accusation of breach of privacy than it is an accusation of surveillance. -- Dr. Graham Hill UK +44 7564 122 633 DE +49 170 487 6192 Partner Optima Partners Senior Associate Nyras Capital |
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.