Re: [projectvrm] Princeton’s Ad-Blocking Superweapon May Put an End to the Ad-Blocking Arms Race - Motherboard

[Aurelie Pols < >]

Can I ask a silly question? 

When you say "Motivation on the corporate side for agreeing with these terms is compliance with the GDPR.", which part of the GDPR is referred to exactly? I'm curious about the various interpretations that are circulating and how "corporations" are indeed motivated, certainly as ePrivacy is still in discussion.
Please enlighten me ;-) muchisimas gracias

Aurélie

On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Doc Searls < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

On Apr 16, 2017, at 11:10 AM, Tim Walters < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

Nice. But what we really need is a superweapon that blocks tracking.

We’re working on one at Customer Commons, with help from the Cyberlaw Clinic at Harvard and working groups at Kantara. The weapon is terms we can assert as first parties that sites and services can agree to as second parties. Those terms can, and will, involve requirements restricting or preventing tracking.

Motivation on the corporate side for agreeing with these terms is compliance with the GDPR.

The latter was the subject of an earlier thread here, and both topics will be up front at VRM Day and IIW. Register here:

http://bit.ly/vrmday2017a

https://iiw24.eventbrite.com/

To be clear, blocking tracking directly will also be on the table. Hope developers of those will be there as well. (We had Privacy Badger folks last time.)

Doc

Most of the ads can stay as far as I'm concerned. I just ignore them.

tw

On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 4:11 PM, John @ BB < " target="_blank">john.philpin@beyondbridges.net> wrote:

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/princetons-ad-blocking-superweapon-may-put-an-end-to-the-ad-blocking-arms-race

John

[Powered by an iSomethingOrOther]
+1 808 344 2914

--

--
Aurélie Pols

Skype: aurelie.pols
Mobile: + 34 630 687 112