Re: [projectvrm] Deep learning access to personal data

[Gordon Finlayson < >]

[First time post, hi everyone]

I was very surprised to see that the medical trust has not sought patient consent before providing non-anonymised sensitive personal information to a third party private corporation, particularly an American one. 

While the UK has a much more liberal approach to data protection than much of the continent, the standard of protection under the directive for sensitive data like medical records is still very high.

Gordon

On 17 Jul 2016, at 03:18, Kevin Cox < "> > wrote:

The data collected about an individual should be made available only to the individual concerned.  Google should publish their algorithms, and what they are doing with the data and the results. Individuals should share in the value derived from the results.

If Google can collate information about individuals, they can distribute value to individuals. Individuals can share with the health providers. If they make inferences about individuals, that should only be available to the individual.

Another way is to give individuals access to their results and the individuals pass it on to Google (and others) - if they wish.

Kevin

On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Scott < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

TechCrunch on the user consent to access to their (particular medical) data.

https://techcrunch.com/2016/07/09/we-need-to-talk-about-ai-and-access-to-publicly-funded-data-sets/

--

Contact 0413961090