Text archives Help


Re: [projectvrm] Ad Industry Latest Attempt to Fix Itself...


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Doc Searls < >
  • To: Don Marti < >
  • Cc: ProjectVRM list < >
  • Subject: Re: [projectvrm] Ad Industry Latest Attempt to Fix Itself...
  • Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 13:45:09 -0400

Good one.

I just pointed to the post in answer to a tweet question first posed by
@SeanBohan, around the ANA’s belief that the status quo in advertising is
just fine:

https://twitter.com/dsearls/status/750746156381134849

Has a nice shortlink to your piece: j.mp/n0we .

Bonus link: <https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0042-online-tracking>

Doc

> On Jul 6, 2016, at 12:35 PM, Don Marti
> < >
> wrote:
>
> begin Don Marti quotation of Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 07:53:15AM -0700:
>> begin Iain Henderson quotation of Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:03:30AM +0100:
>>>
>>> http://www.marketingweek.com/2016/06/02/does-the-ad-industry-need-a-global-response-to-the-rise-of-ad-blocking/?
>>>
>>> Some useful points in there, but as yet no recognition that the issue
>>> could, at least in part, be solved by building on the side of the
>>> customer.
>
>> Everyone agrees that "we" need to get rid of "bad"
>> ads. Where "we" is defined as "you" and "bad" is
>> "not the ones that work for me."
>
> Yet another extended mix of a list posting...
>
> http://blog.aloodo.org/posts/what-do-you-mean-we/
>
> --
> Don Marti
> < >
>
> http://zgp.org/~dmarti/
> Are you safe from 3rd-party web tracking? http://www.aloodo.org/test/




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.