Text archives Help


Re: [projectvrm] IoT data--for whom?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jonathan King < >
  • To: Identity Coach < >
  • Cc: Project VRM < >
  • Subject: Re: [projectvrm] IoT data--for whom?
  • Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 20:37:22 +0100

+1 Thank you for sharing!  

Reciprocating with European Data Protection Supervisor opinion, Towards a New Digital Ethics:


"The EU in particular now has a ‘critical window’ before mass adoption of these technologies to build the values into digital structures which will define our society." FN 53

On Sep 14, 2015, at 6:29 PM, Identity Coach < "> > wrote:

Interesting take from the Guardian:

Data could be the real draw of the internet of things – but for whom?
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/sep/14/data-generation-insights-internet-of-things

From the part about the darker side:

A Ponemon Institute survey of 1,900 consumers, for example, found a whopping 82% of respondents say IoT manufacturers had not provided any details about how their personal information is handled.

A recent Pew study of almost 500 Americans, meanwhile, also found that 88% of respondents said it’s important that someone or some agency or group not watch or listen to them without their permission. Likewise, 63% said it’s important to them to be able to “go around in public without always being identified”.

The market for VRM is there, backed by clear and present evidence, but the developers? Blinders.

  j.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.