Text archives Help


[projectvrm] W3C vs. adtech


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Doc Searls < >
  • To: ProjectVRM list < >
  • Subject: [projectvrm] W3C vs. adtech
  • Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:38:47 -0400

In Mediapost: Supercookies, Digital Fingerprinting Undermine Trust In Web,
W3C Says
<http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/254275/supercookies-digital-fingerprinting-undermine-tru.html>.

Closing paragraphs:

> The W3C's report comes at a time when the online ad industry appears
> increasingly interested in using non-cookie technology for tracking. Just
> two months ago, the self-regulatory group Network Advertising Initiative
> issued guidance aimed at enabling ad networks to track people with
> techniques like digital fingerprinting, without violating the group's
> privacy standards.
>
> The NAI's recent guidance requires ad companies to disclose their use of
> “non-cookie technology,” in order to inform consumers that rejecting
> third-party cookies won't necessarily block tracking and ad targeting. (The
> NAI's longstanding privacy rules require ad companies to inform consumers
> about behavioral advertising -- regardless of tracking technology -- and
> allow them to opt out of receiving ads targeted based on Web activity.)
>
> The W3C clearly doesn't agree that the self-regulatory group's guidance
> will go far enough to protect Web users' privacy. Instead, the W3C is
> calling on browser developers to create tools that potentially could help
> users defeat fingerprinting efforts.
>
> The group ends its critique by urging policy makers “to be aware that
> unsanctioned tracking may introduce privacy, security and consumer
> protection concerns within their jurisdiction, and to consider appropriate
> action.”


If we had full individual agency — in other words, elementary VRM — there
would be no argument here.

Doc


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.