- From: Doc Searls <
>
- To: ProjectVRM list <
>
- Subject: [projectvrm] W3C vs. adtech
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:38:47 -0400
In Mediapost: Supercookies, Digital Fingerprinting Undermine Trust In Web,
W3C Says
<
http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/254275/supercookies-digital-fingerprinting-undermine-tru.html>.
Closing paragraphs:
>
The W3C's report comes at a time when the online ad industry appears
>
increasingly interested in using non-cookie technology for tracking. Just
>
two months ago, the self-regulatory group Network Advertising Initiative
>
issued guidance aimed at enabling ad networks to track people with
>
techniques like digital fingerprinting, without violating the group's
>
privacy standards.
>
>
The NAI's recent guidance requires ad companies to disclose their use of
>
“non-cookie technology,” in order to inform consumers that rejecting
>
third-party cookies won't necessarily block tracking and ad targeting. (The
>
NAI's longstanding privacy rules require ad companies to inform consumers
>
about behavioral advertising -- regardless of tracking technology -- and
>
allow them to opt out of receiving ads targeted based on Web activity.)
>
>
The W3C clearly doesn't agree that the self-regulatory group's guidance
>
will go far enough to protect Web users' privacy. Instead, the W3C is
>
calling on browser developers to create tools that potentially could help
>
users defeat fingerprinting efforts.
>
>
The group ends its critique by urging policy makers “to be aware that
>
unsanctioned tracking may introduce privacy, security and consumer
>
protection concerns within their jurisdiction, and to consider appropriate
>
action.”
If we had full individual agency — in other words, elementary VRM — there
would be no argument here.
Doc
- [projectvrm] W3C vs. adtech, Doc Searls, 07/17/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.