Text archives Help


Re: [projectvrm] Zeta Secures $150 Million in Funding as Marketing Tech Rises | Digital - Advertising Age


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Katherine Warman Kern < >
  • To: Don Marti < >
  • Cc: Project VRM < >
  • Subject: Re: [projectvrm] Zeta Secures $150 Million in Funding as Marketing Tech Rises | Digital - Advertising Age
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:31:14 -0400

sorry that I didn't have the time to reference why I thought this was 2 steps
backwards - this quote : "combine the strengths of ad tech with customer
relationship marketing."

This combination is where advertisers risk crossing the line.

CRM should be permission based - "I am an existing customer and I give a
company permission to use info they have about my use of their product and
other relevant info I intentionally signal to serve me better"

Advertising (whether it is placed by adtech or otherwise) in my opinion is
targeted to non-existing customers or customers who haven't given permission
to use personal info - if it doesn't respect that signal, advertising will
cross the line to have a negative impact on the brand.

If a company is going to use automated technology, over which one has no
control over message and timing, then do not personalize!

I suspect, if someone dared to do the research, that the most recalled
advertising today is advertising that has turned off a prospective or
existing customer because it was automated and inappropriate.

K-

Katherine Warman Kern
@comradity

> On Jul 15, 2015, at 7:47 AM, Don Marti
> < >
> wrote:
>
> begin Katherine Warman Kern quotation of Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 07:26:58AM
> -0400:
>> Two steps backwards.
>>
>> http://adage.com/article/digital/zeta-secures-150-million-marketing-tech-makes-mark/299479/?utm_source=daily_email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=adage&ttl=1437518180
>
> Consolidation.
>
> The company will use a healthy chunk of its new
> funding to acquire companies that specialize in
> social media marketing, web marketing and website
> optimization, said Mr. Gerber.
>
> Part of the positive feedback between the
> IT->Marketing shift and on-premises->SaaS shift.
>
> More money is being spent by Marketing directly with
> little or no IT department involvement. Which means
> it's much easier for vendors to sell SaaS than
> anything requiring an install.
>
> On the vendor side, once you have everything cleaned
> up enough to run as SaaS, it's easier to sell to
> Marketing customers, which means Marketing gets more
> control of systems and so on.
>
> --
> Don Marti
> < >
>
> http://zgp.org/~dmarti/
> Are you safe from 3rd-party web tracking? http://www.aloodo.org/test/



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.