RE: [projectvrm] RSA sat

["Mike O'Neill" < >]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I liked it till the last sentence,

"Moreover, security and trust issues need to be addressed, and privacy 
concerns have to be balanced with the benefits of openness. Finally, the 
infrastructure must be connected to existing payment solutions so as to 
enable serious trading and allow it to unfold its full potential."

There cannot be a trade-off between privacy and benefits, individual control 
does not need to be "balanced" -  that is where the rot starts.  Same goes 
for having to connect to existing payment solutions in order to be "serious". 
There may need to be an option for them at first, but the system should be 
able to work without them from the off.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doc Searls 
> [mailto:
 ]
> Sent: 08 April 2015 16:02
> To: ProjectVRM list
> Subject: [projectvrm] RSA sat
> 
> Jus heard about this from one of us: 
> <http://sat.researchstudio.at/en/web-of-
> needs>
> 
> Anyone have connections there?
> 
> Very VRooMy, seems ot me.
> 
> Doc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (MingW32)
Comment: Using gpg4o v3.4.103.5490 - http://www.gpg4o.com/
Charset: utf-8

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVJYxCAAoJEHMxUy4uXm2J/msIAK6Bkb1LrT0DsfeGQsTG1Y6r
SkE9PEFGTrEcCSCXpGUaZymZNGTiQMarIJclzRZrbZBHCuEMbwYPksl2WYqxMQan
QSwjT5hqAp9O6f6x6OuZ/ftnO89inrmSs+qdppSbL8mR/fODYEvDRVujoxohSgYK
yS+KedML2zQKT+xZdffNwPqYrAyN+AhKiI453YHwyt02n94nzffWt/Iw+hVVs9if
cVIRSuyMovCsVvN3rKvhAEcVmwEZmQ6xfyGTdXNtHguWCGCTleaoy/p+B5MmryBg
25vQJhfw/8Ya38/v10F00Zo30guVRtrEzoMbe4WLQp6vWFFIDwhC3N4+3eyZ+7E=
=cK7r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----