| Kevin, By your reckoning it seems that I would be able to offer a book for sale and, even if it only sold one or two copies, the distributed “‘extra’ funds of best sellers” would allow me to receive $10,000 to break even. I’m sure lots of people would happily take advantage of that arrangement, thus diminishing the funds available to compensate the best-selling authors and previous buyers; but it inevitably reduces innovation and kills any desire to be creative. And how long would you and the other best-selling authors be willing to subsidize me and the other authors who are rewarded for producing a book that few (if any) wish to purchase? Sharon. On 4 Feb 2015, at 12:19 PM, Kevin Cox <
" class="">
> wrote: Crosbie If we created a system where a person who copied and sent it on to someone else would incur a lesser reward then we might have enough incentive to stop wholesale copying. Here is one possible way. We purchase a book for $10. The author to "breakeven" needs to collect $10,000 in sales. If people who purchase the book get a future discount on other books once the author reaches the breakeven point. Let us divide the extra money up so that 50% of the extra goes to the author and 50% goes to the previous buyers. Now if the book sells $110,000 then $50,000 is distributed to the 11,000 people who purchased the book. What this does is to distribute the benefits across all the authors because of the flag fall. In fact, it could be arranged so that those authors who did not get to $10,000 received some of the "extra" funds of the best sellers. Kevin On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Crosbie Fitch <
" target="_blank" class="">
> wrote:
|
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.