Re: [projectvrm] Virgin Trains and, um, intentcasting

[Doc Searls < >]

Agreed. 

Great post, Lionel.

Doc

> On Jan 11, 2015, at 3:30 AM, Crosbie Fitch 
> <
 >
>  wrote:
> 
> From: L. Wolberg
>> ...
>> The message is forwarded to Virgin, but *without* Virgin seeing that it
>> is Adam calling (using clever crypto). 
> 
> There we are. Well done L.Wolberg. I'm glad someone gets it.
> 
> Instead of Adam being hoodwinked into believing that Virgin can be
> contractually/legally bound to make no unauthorised disclosures concerning
> Adam, Virgin doesn't get to know it's Adam in the first place.
> 
> Adam can choose the identity he uses, whether an ephemeral, one-off
> "passenger-in-loo" identity, or a regular commuter identity with alias
> "Scooter the Commuter", or even the human identity called Adam Greenwood.