RE: [projectvrm] Does this list welcome natural law/rights wonks?

["Crosbie Fitch" < >]

From: Graham Hill
>This forum should be big enough to cater for all kinds of ideas, opinions
and beliefs,
>irrespective of how different or incompatible they may be.

In theory there is the 'should', in practice there is the welcomed consensus
vs the unwelcome nut-jobs.


>There is no need to decide for one or another.

No need, sure, but I'm curious as to whether an opinion is available.


>This forum should also be adult enough to know when to take an errant
discussion off-line.

And is discussion of natural law/rights errant?

Should it be offline for those peculiar folk who are into 'that sort of
thing'?

As Johh Wunderlich said: "Please accept that others don't share your
assumptions and/or don't accept your assertions so they hold different
views, and leave it at that."

While one can admit that nut-jobs have different views to ours, let's not
waste time in errant discussion of them, eh?
 

To misquote Voltaire, "I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend
to the death your right to say it". Let's hope it doesn't come to that.

Voltaire is dead, and the understanding of what a right is is mouldering in
a hospice somewhere...