From: Graham Reginald Hill [mailto: ]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2014 9:17am
To:
Cc: ProjectVRM list
Subject: Aw: Re: [projectvrm] Tim Friedman's column
Hi PhilIt's funny, but I don't see any of the implied malaise in society that AirBnB seems to sum up for you. Times change and our thinking must keep up with the changes or we risk being rendered obsolete.I am not a big believer in Rachel Botsman's Collaborative Consumption that underlies a lot of the receent developments in the sharing society. I prefer to buy and own my own things and am not particularly keen on sharing them with others, whether I am paid for doing so or not. But I also recognise that others are more than happy to do so, whether on societally moral grounds or more desperate financial ones.I am however a big believer in equality. Not the mindless affirmative action kind of equality that causes so much moral outrage, but the freedom to be all that you can be type that comes with full emancipation. Did it never occur to you that half of the family may want more out of life than the intellectual and aspirational vacuousness of being stuck working in the home. And that a second income may be a source of freedom that being dependant on the other half can never provide.It is frankly ludicrous to equate renting out your home, car or whatnot with a rather simplistic theory about a growing sense of economic despair. All the evidence suggests that people have changed since the onset of the recent recesssion. AirBnB provides a multi-sided market platform that enables sellers and buyers to more easily meet. A recent stufy of 5,000 AirBnB listings in San Francisco found that 2/3 of them were entire apartments or houses that were not going to be shared at all. AirBnB simply provided a better marketplace to rent out what was probably going to be rented out somewhere else anyway.Best regards from Cologne, Graham
--
Dr. Graham Hill
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.