Text archives Help


Re: [personal-clouds] [projectvrm] How Web 2.0 killed the Internet


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Phil Windley < >
  • To: Colm Britton < >
  • Cc: Johannes Ernst < >, Joe Trippi < >, Bernard Liautaud < >, Doc Searls < >, Tom Crowl < >, David Brin < >, ProjectVRM list < >, " List" < >, Nick Katsivelos < >, Aral Balkan < >, Drummond Reed < >, Craig Burton < >, John Battelle < >, Andy Oram < >
  • Subject: Re: [personal-clouds] [projectvrm] How Web 2.0 killed the Internet
  • Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:21:47 -0600


On Jun 10, 2014, at 4:09 AM, Colm Britton < "> > wrote:




On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Johannes Ernst < " target="_blank"> > wrote:

On Jun 5, 2014, at 11:42, Phil Windley < "> > wrote:

> Yes, I think it does. I think each entity (regardless of whether it’s a person, place, things, organization, concept, or sub division of such) should be representable online.

Yes! Interestingly, for much of what those entities do or can do online, there is very little difference between whether it is a human entity, or a thing entity. This has interesting implications.

Would the key difference between the 2 entities be that the thing entity, lets call it X, requires an administrating entity to be responsible for it, whether that, in most circumstances, is a human entity or another thing entity that has been given authority over X by the ultimate owner, the human entity?

I think that’s a useful distinction. In our system, so far at least, things always have a relationship with an owner. People don’t need any other relationship to be represented. 



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.