- From: "Savage, Christopher" <
>
- To: "ProjectVRM list (
)" <
>
- Subject: FW: Battle of the Online Forms [Was: [projectvrm] Mobile SSL hole s]
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:24:49 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
I'm hoping it's OK to send these points to the list...
Chris S.
-----Original Message-----
From: Savage, Christopher
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 8:20 AM
To: 'Crosbie Fitch'
Subject: RE: Battle of the Online Forms [Was: [projectvrm] Mobile SSL hole s]
-----Original Message-----
From: Crosbie Fitch
[mailto:
]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:33 AM
To: ProjectVRM list
Subject: RE: Battle of the Online Forms [Was: [projectvrm] Mobile SSL hole s]
>
>Perhaps Christopher's idea might work if augmented?<<
>
>One can provide corporations interested in doing business with a choice:<<
>
>A) The corporate way: Contracts are agreed to merely by performing an
>
>arbitrary act (an act one is at liberty to do anyway, e.g. remove
>
>shrinkwrap), and one can sign one's (apparently alienable) liberty away in
>
>a contract (not that corporations have liberty), in which case neutralising
>
>adhesive contracts are provided (to counter those of the corporate party),
>
>OR<<
>
>The natural/VRM way: Contracts are only agreed to when both parties
>
>voluntarily signify acceptance (by a specific act - unnecessary for any
>
>other purpose - that can only construe voluntary acceptance), and contracts
>
>affect only property, not an individual's inalienable liberty (human beings
>
>cannot surrender their liberty to post negative reviews, reverse engineer
>
>the product, etc.).<<
>
>One should not just use the corrupt party's corruption against them, but
>
>should demonstrate that there is a right way of doing things.<<
Agreed!!! Our "automatic" terms and conditions should contain something that
boils down to, "but if you want to do this transaction in a civilized way,
then..." and lay out the path to what you are calling the "natural/VRM way."
My point is that we need a legal mechanism, which we evidently do not now
have, for individuals to say "STOP!" to the bulls**t that enterprises legally
impose on individuals via online terms and conditions.
Chris S.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.