RE: Battle of the Online Forms [Was: [projectvrm] Mobile SSL hole s]

["Crosbie Fitch" < >]

Perhaps Christopher's idea might work if augmented?

One can provide corporations interested in doing business with a choice:

A) The corporate way: Contracts are agreed to merely by performing an
arbitrary act (an act one is at liberty to do anyway, e.g. remove
shrinkwrap), and one can sign one's (apparently alienable) liberty away in a
contract (not that corporations have liberty), in which case neutralising
adhesive contracts are provided (to counter those of the corporate party),
OR

B) The natural/VRM way: Contracts are only agreed to when both parties
voluntarily signify acceptance (by a specific act - unnecessary for any
other purpose - that can only construe voluntary acceptance), and contracts
affect only property, not an individual's inalienable liberty (human beings
cannot surrender their liberty to post negative reviews, reverse engineer
the product, etc.).


One should not just use the corrupt party's corruption against them, but
should demonstrate that there is a right way of doing things.