Text archives Help


Re: [projectvrm] Do Amazon & Google Make Strange Webfellows?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Mary Hodder < >
  • To: Dean Landsman < >
  • Cc: ProjectVRM list < >
  • Subject: Re: [projectvrm] Do Amazon & Google Make Strange Webfellows?
  • Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:43:43 -0700

Amazon bought IMDB a few years ago. They are the same essentially and share
data.

On Sep 10, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Dean Landsman wrote:

> Doc suggested that I post this to the VRM List for discussion, and perhaps
> some technical insight. It has to do with search, advertising, privacy,data
> mining and tracking.
>
> Here's the background: Recently i was trying to recall a movie title, in
> order to be sure I recommended the correct one to a friend. i recalled a
> specific scene, but was not sure just which of three very similar movies of
> this genre it might be. Honestly, I'd converged all three movies into one,
> as they were quite similar in plot, dialog and story content. The one
> scene in particular, though, was unique and very entertaining.
>
> I recalled the titles of two of the three films. i looked them up, via
> Google and Bing, and also checked Roger Ebert's reviews to see if he might
> have made mention of the one scene in question. During this process I also
> searched the names of a few actors, using Wikipedia and IMDB.
>
> Never once did I attempt to purchase a movie, nor did I seek them out on
> Amazon (or any other online shopping vehicle, such as Craigslist or eBay,
> etc.). Repeat: I NEVER ATTEMPTED A PURCHASE. The entire exercise was
> pursuit of a film title; in particular: a specific scene of note.
>
> A day or two after launching this search I began to receive offers from
> Amazon via email to PURCHASE two of the three films. Note: at that point I
> hadn't yet remembered or discovered the name of the third film.
>
> How does Amazon know I have an interest in these films? Is Google sharing
> my searches with Amazon? Same question holds for Bing, Wikipedia and IMDB.
> IMDB is less the suspect, as I looked up a few actors' filmographies, and
> clicked on a number of titles to see if I could locate the film in
> question. None of those films were offered to me by Amazon, just the two
> films I researched via Google and Wikipedia.
>
> Is there, perhaps, a third party, capturing, collecting and doing some
> machine-driven analysis of my [film] searches and the providing this data,
> thereby advising, Amazon to pitch me these purchase offers?
>
> Could Google be selling this to Amazon for a percentage of the [potential]
> sale? On this list we have often discussed that each and every user query
> on Google seems to be handled as though it represents a transaction
> opportunity. Those ads on the side and the top would verify such
> assumption. But is Google sharing this information that is of potential
> internal value? I doubt this, as the Google strategy seems more to
> position itself to be a conduit to sales from within its own
> infrastructure.
>
> My guess is that it is much more insidious. I run Ghostery to block much
> of the rampant tracking, and regularly check Collusion to see what I might
> next be careful to block via Ghostery or other utilities. All of this web
> activity took place on the most recent release of Firefox. The culprit, I
> believe, is (are?) third party (parties?) who surreptitiously lurk in the
> background, gather data and send it to Amazon.
>
> Doc suggested that the VRM List might offer some insight and discussion
> about these such practices.
>
> Oh, and by the way, completely by accident on a different search I
> discovered the name of the third movie, the very one with the scene I
> recalled. This happened Saturday. Amazon has yet to offer me a copy of
> that one for purchase. Of course, the day is young..
>
> Looking forward to The List's comments and response.
>
> --Dean
>
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.