Text archives Help


Re: [projectvrm] VRM tool characteristics


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Joe Andrieu < >
  • To: Doc Searls < >
  • Cc: , Project VRM < >
  • Subject: Re: [projectvrm] VRM tool characteristics
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:10:11 -0700

Interesting... there is something missing, in the direction of helping customers help themselves.

I think this is an unintended legacy of our initial framing. VRM... the "R" is relationships.  "Tools for independence and engagement", which frames the value proposition in the context of a relationship to someone/something else.

Even in my discussion of user-driven services, http://blog.joeandrieu.com/2009/04/26/introducing-user-driven-services/, I am speaking essentially about services run by others:


  1. Impulse from the User
  2. Control
  3. Transparency
  4. Data Portability
  5. Service Endpoint Portability
  6. Self Hosting
  7. User Generativity
  8. Improvability
  9. Self-managed Identity
  10. Duty of Care

Even the core definition I propose is missing it:
User Driven Services: services that maximize value creation by maximizing user control and authority.

The presumption we all have, is this:

Good services/companies/technology create value for the individual.

(I'm sad to say that "for the individual" is missing in that definition of User Driven Services. It should be.)

I expect that the idea that customer is the recipient of value is so inherent to the entire conversation, that we just don't think about it. Like a fish who doesn't know about the water... but if you think about it, corporate software does NOT have this mandate. Corporate software is there to create value for the corporation. VRM is there to create value for the individual.

Doc and I both anchored this here:
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/vrm/2011/03/22/the-customer-vector/

And here:
http://blog.joeandrieu.com/2008/01/09/the-vrm-vector/

But even these are still focused on value for the customer by someone else (the vendor).

There is something vital in the idea of tools that allow the individual to create value for themselves.

To her credit, this has always been a focus for Adriana Lukas. While I've focused more on reinventing service relationships, she's always been much more passionate about self-service VRM.  It's a thread we should include in our core.

-j




Joe Andrieu

 
 ">
 
+1 (805) 705-8651

On 6/15/2011 1:36 PM, Doc Searls wrote:
" type="cite">Thanks!

I had meant #4 to cover that, in the sense that "managing" one's data would include understanding it; but maybe that's not the case. Gotta think about it....

Doc

On Jun 15, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Jamie Smith wrote:

Thanks Doc, this is a great start.

Would you say that number 4 ('help customers manage') would include tools to analyse your own data?

Such tools might help you identify your own behavioural or commercial trends (for example by finding patterns in your travel expenses or your weekly shopping), and in doing so would help you better a) express intent (#3) and b) engage (#4).

I suspect that such VRM tools would not necessarily have to have this characteristic, but if they did, then I'd want it to be a separate and distinct characteristic from 'help customers manage' - perhaps along the lines of:

6. VRM tools help customers better understand their own data. This is helping the customer discover and expose new value in their own data sets, on their terms and for their own benefit.

Keen to hear your views.

Jamie

On 15 June 2011 19:07, Doc Searls < " target="_blank"> > wrote:
@jamiedsmith tweeted a pointer to Alex Bogusky's New Conscious Consumer Bill of Rights...



... adding "needs more symmetry of power for consumers though". 

Rather than critique or seek to improve Alex's Bill, I thought I'd post something we've needed for awhile: a list of characteristics shared by VRM tools. I did that here:


Here they are:

  1. VRM tools are personal. As with hammers, wallets and mobile phones, people use them as individuals,. They are social only in secondary ways.
  2. VRM tools help customers express intent. These include preferences, policies, terms and means of engagement, permissions, requests and anything else that’s possible in a free market (i.e. the open marketplace surrounding any one vendor’s silo or walled garden for “managing” captive customers).
  3. VRM tools help customers engage. This can be with each other, or with any organization, including (and especially) its CRM system.
  4. VRM tools help customers manage. This includes both their own data and systems and their relationships with other entities, and their systems.
  5. VRM tools are substitutable. This means no vendor of VRM tools can lock users in.
Suggestions and improvements welcome.

Doc










Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.