I should instigate a QS/PDS conversation within the Society for Participatory Medicine; it's a good fit, might bring in some adherents closer to the healthcare field, which needs disruptive innovation.
Jon Lebkowsky
(Sent from my iPhone)
On May 28, 2011, at 12:59 PM, Mary Hodder < "> > wrote:
> Hi Iain,
>
> Yes.. totally agree about raising awareness about a Personal Data model.. i'm in a session as we speak about Personal APIs and
> they've started it off with a model of silos (eeek) and so i'm trying to introduce the PDS as the repository for my data.. and
> then apps that sit on top that mess around with my data that i invite in and control..
>
> i'm also taking notes and trying to raise awareness generally..
>
> i've proposed a session to the organizers today about personal data.. hoping to lead that later today.
>
> mary
>
> On May 28, 2011, at 8:12 AM, Iain Henderson wrote:
>
>> Hi Mary,
>>
>> I was going to attend, but over-dosed on travel in May, so sold the ticket.
>>
>> As per Adriana's notes, there is a strong QS group in London, that is fully up to speed on the data implications of self-hacking.
>>
>> The point I was going to raise/ present on if i'd made it along was obviously the notion of the personal data service as ultimately the repository from where QS/ self-hacking will best be done, because that allows the combination of metrics, and the atomic level data to be held across each. Indeed given the pretty open nature of most of the QS tools, getting that data into a PDS is pretty easy.
>>
>> Let me know if there is any interest in the PDS concept at the event, and perhaps we can get into those synergies via PDEC afterwards.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Iain
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 24 May 2011, at 19:51, Mary Hodder wrote:
>>
>>> Yes.. sold out about 3 months ago or so.
>>>
>>> Crazy.. Kaliya and I are going .. saturday and sunday.
>>>
>>> Yes.. there are overlaps though my impression of the organizers is they are very into the success of their own thing..
>>> we invited them to IIW, Personal Data 2.0 and other things.. and they seem to have no interest and don't even
>>> want to talk about overlaps. (This seems to apply to the newer younger folks without much SV experience -- less
>>> than one cycle .. not the older folks who've been around for multiple cycles.. but its the younger folks who are
>>> organizing QS this weekend)
>>>
>>> So if folks here know people in the community to talk with about how we see overlaps on both sides (not just VRM
>>> and PDE side looking toward QS but also to get QS folks looking toward VRM and PDE) that would be most helpful.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> mary
>>>
>>> On May 24, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Dan Miller wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yikes!
>>>>
>>>> Hadn't seen this and, alas, now it is sold out.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Doc Searls < "> > wrote:
>>>> There are huge synergies and overlaps between VRM and Quantified Self (self-tracking, personal informatics) interests, technologies, missions, and communities. If I were on The Coast, I'd do my best to make the QS conference this weekend in Silicon Valley. Hope some of ya'll can get there. Here's the link:
>>>>
>>>> http://quantifiedself.com/conference/
>>>>
>>>> Like IIW, it's at the Computer History Museum.
>>>>
>>>> Doc
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> e-mail: ">
>> blog: www.iainhenderson.info
>> twitter: @iainh1
>>
>> This email and any attachment contains information which is private and confidential and is intended for the addressee only. If you are not an addressee, you are not authorised to read, copy or use the e-mail or any attachment. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and then destroy it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.