Text archives Help


Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand."


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Alec Muffett < >
  • To: Jay Gairson < >
  • Cc: " " < >, Christy Eller < >, Alan Patrick < >, " " < >
  • Subject: Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand."
  • Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 07:45:41 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=AJzXfSaw4NGsr7KevcTY2aG3yw+fn1x5gh9pEKj3l5MNc/sDvNswaUA4Zb2e2w/xwt cV6VXLwqfQ/edYzrHgvc0FWd1/hXqf0wlueqhVWuIH8gwsxqfUuRoVpaqmdq4o930UaK Jz+wsT2gZt2+HWgoXmhoSRtQP97huveGjfx/E=

On 24 Jun 2010, at 00:39, Jay Gairson wrote:

> What I would love to see is an ad agency that gives consumers a choice.
> Essentially the policy would be as follows:
> * We will post ads on websites, here are the top websites we are on, and
> you will see those ads.
> * If you do not want to see those ads, you can pay us _FLAT FEE_ per
> month/week/day or _BY USE FEE_ per month/week/day to avoid ads.
> * We will pay the website owners as if you had viewed the ads on them that
> you are paying us not to see.


That's so strange; I would rather directly pay a website where I though the
content was worth paying for.

The above just sounds like blackmail ("pay us X or you will see Y").

Why have the middleman?

Oh, wait, there are people out there who make a living off advertising...
Duh.

-a

--

http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

§