- From: Alan Patrick <
>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand."
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:03:38 +0100
On 23/06/2010 19:01, Alec Muffett wrote:
So what you're saying is:
1) people who can be focused, make profit in spite of pissing off
disorganised hordes of folk
2) the "network effect" has a downside as well as an upside, and
3) what the net needs is an effective way to pillory the bad guys [ED: But
that has a whole host of other issues]
Glad to see you are using my word for the "thing that is bigger than
just the Web" - aka net - after all, Alec ;-)
Anyway, my point 3 was not about pillorying bad guys, the point was
actually that any group action (pillorying among others) won't work
unless it ensures that the transaction costs of hosebagging are raised
higher than the benefits it confers, for eg via:
- negative social capital that has consequences - eg limiting access
- filters (eg spam filtering)
- blockers (eg with some websites)
- user bypasses (which is where VRM et al come in)
Joe also made a useful point, ie services that don't do this scummy
stuff may prove to be more effective and thus hosebaggng dies a
darwinian death
My feelings are: 1) yes 2) yes 3) dream on.
All progress is from unreasonable people, to paraphrase G B Shaw ;-)
I believe Adriana's already made the point that it's not the _Internet_ but the _Web_ which would
benefit from some means of tarring and feathering those who annoy us; and I believe the above
explains the fruitlessness (and, probably, negative value) of trying to partition "Twitter
Space" from "The Web" - because if we determine that @freecloud in Twitter space
is worth of being pilloried, then that probably goes for the primary author of
http://www.broadstuff.com/ too.
And I am in furious agreement re teh Web, but I would argue that it is a
wider issue than just the Web.
It is true of any Internet (or in fact other comms medium) driven
service that yields low transaction costs for hosebaggers and drives
winner takes all markets. Network effect entities sadly do both.
Rgds
Alan
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", (continued)
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Tara Hunt, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Jon Lebkowsky, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Adriana Lukas, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Alan Patrick, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Adriana Lukas, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Alan Patrick, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Alec Muffett, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Alan Patrick, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Alec Muffett, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Christy Eller, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Alec Muffett, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Joe Andrieu, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Adriana Lukas, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Frank Paynter, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Alec Muffett, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Alec Muffett, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Joe Andrieu, 06/23/2010
- Re: [projectvrm] "I am not a brand.", Jay Gairson, 06/23/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.