Text archives Help


Re: [projectvrm] Aroxo


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Adriana Lukas < >
  • To: Victor Demydov < >
  • Cc: ProjectVRM list < >
  • Subject: Re: [projectvrm] Aroxo
  • Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 18:24:23 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=krZPfwYbJ7HBJ3EhY7xz1fQjPKwzQLiEiKD7QGLYNu9df1aCQxlBqjcN/7B3h9cm93 KR8AKSrpm5//60r61vZ/4VpCguF8pMZ9X9vVP0y+RdFMeA/hAHLrdVVQQOqpv8YJsxZe 3gLNnDGorkdzIykcM6vSXcjYQPSZUU44aWHGI=

This is rather interesting. Definitely a step in the right direction,
what with the 'buyer driven' commerce. It'll be interesting to see if
and where this goes.

That said, same criticism applies to aroxo as I have for ebay, it's a
silo. But as you say, nothing is perfect. :)

A xx
--
The network is always stronger than the node...
but a network starts with a node.

http://www.mediainfluencer.net
http://www.vrmhub.net
http://www.themineproject.org




2009/5/5 Victor Demydov
< >:
> Hello all,
>
> Did anyone catch this a few days ago?
> http://uk.techcrunch.com/2009/04/30/aroxos-21st-century-haggling-engine-will-target-ebay/
>
> These guys are from UK. They've developed a 'haggling engine' that very
> much goes along the principles of VRM in terms of shifting the power from
> supplier to the user.
>
> Back in Feb 2008, I had a lively dsicussion about very similar concept with
> Adriana in New York. While some key (at least in my mind) components to
> make this a true VRM system are missing from Aroxo's implementation, I
> think that this is a great step in the right direction and a good 'beta
> test' of the space.
>
> PS: Execution has some holes, but nothing is perfect i suppose :)
>
> Would love to hear people's comments.
>
> Victor Demydov


  • [projectvrm] Aroxo, Victor Demydov, 05/05/2009
    • Re: [projectvrm] Aroxo, Adriana Lukas, 05/05/2009

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.