|
Hi Matt,
You say "I think the terms [of the relationship] have always been based on the
individual's value agenda". Well, that floors me. I'll leave other people to
comment on that if they want.
But your
core point is that VRM is a tool to 'break the mass market agenda' because it
allows individuals to vocalize different messages to "allow greater granularity
and customization (hopefully) of product offerings."
Yes,
VRM is an enabler of customization. But from my perspective this is just
one small part of VRM.
And if
anything, your argument underlines my point about personal decision-making. In
order to be able to 'vocalize' a specification for a customized product, you
have to go through quite a complex decision-making process. You have to generate
a very clear idea of exactly what you want and what you don't want. You need to
check this against what is available and possible. You then need to weigh up
costs and trade-offs and set them against your circumstances and priorities.
Then you need to bring all this together to make a decision.
So the
improved ability to specify and customize is a quintessential product of 'better
decision making'.
In fact,
I would go so far as to suggest (going back to earlier discussions), "It
is not VRM unless it helps individuals to make and implement decisions
better".
In this,
'better' includes better product outcomes (quality, fit, price etc including
customization), better implementation (time, hassle, convenience, cost, etc),
and a better decision making process itself (time, hassle, fun, cost, ease etc
involved making decisions about both products and
implementation).
Alan
|
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.