- From: "Adriana Lukas" <
>
- To: "Doc Searls" <
>
- Cc:
,
,
- Subject: Re: [projectvrm] Microsoft's Personal Health Care Records
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:58:54 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=RSHF3u4BC4dOhRXXNug02yZKvSFEw+w3bqgzuAk89VJdGKlYFp5yITWfwZg0cJ18Ae4G5yPiUz/iCpb8jbtFngw0+FBN2ApEGCltg0zfRHNvh+f46H3+eEzKkzVy5qQiNMqaBsQptHVrPN9A5+vT3OAPSeQUo6iopTmEy1Vyp9o=
Ah, just saw Doc's response as I sent mine. Yes, agreed. Will make
that point mercilessly. :)
A
On 08/10/2007, Doc Searls
<
>
wrote:
>
I agree. No single topic, when I bring up VRM examples, attracts more
>
interest, "hits home" harder, cuts across political lines better.
>
>
I also think it *is* about buyers and sellers, or individuals and
>
organizations.
>
>
In fact, I can't think of a better example of a problem that can *only* be
>
resolved, ultimately, buy making the individual the "point of integration".
>
>
Independence is key. This is where the Microsoft solution -- as I
>
understand it so far -- is one more problem. There is nothing wrong with a
>
dependency on a provider; but there is plenty wrong with one that cannot be
>
severed and re-attached elsewhere without loss of personal data or control
>
of it.
>
>
Independence is key. Independence is choice. That's what makes markets.
>
That's what makes relationships, too.
>
>
IMHO, etc.
>
>
Doc
>
>
At 11:33 AM -0400 10/8/07,
>
>
wrote:
>
>In my view it is slap-bang central.
>
>
>
>You could see the VRM space as a series of concentric circles: each with
>
>its own technical challenges, business models and opportunities etc.
>
>
>
>At the core is 'my data', which starts with administrative basics such as
>
>name, address etc but very quickly spills out across the whole of my life.
>
>So it quickly becomes a series of personal databases: my home, my money,
>
>my car, my travel arrangements, my health, my job, etc each of which need
>
>to be managed, updated, kept accurate etc if possible without any hassle
>
>or effort (!!!)
>
>
>
>The second ring is the decisions I make relating to these life departments
>
>(plus life events such as 'moving home', 'getting married', 'getting
>
>divorced', etc). Here the emphasis moves from data gathering, storage,
>
>management, access, protection, security, authentication etc to accessing
>
>and using information I need to make the best possible decision -
>
>including search, comparison, Q&A etc. At this stage the individual is
>
>beginning to interact with 'the market', including trading/sharing
>
>information with potential suppliers.
>
>
>
>The third ring is implementation of these decisions: logistics,
>
>administration, fulfilment, payment etc.
>
>
>
>With each of these three rinigs (1) my data 2) my decisions, and 3)
>
>implementing my decisions) the underlying personal database is a critical
>
>component.
>
>
>
>One question is, is Microsoft doing this to 'empower' the individual or to
>
>create a new monopoly dependence like its operating systems? But that has
>
>got nothing to do with the idea itself.
>
>
>
>Alan
>
>
>
--
The network is always stronger than the node.
http://www.mediainfluencer.net
http://www.bigblogcompany.net
http://www.samizdata.net/blog
Background:
http://www.mediainfluencer.net/about/
Skype: adriana872
UK mobile: +44 787 6757129
US mobile: +1 732 447 5115
- Re: [projectvrm] Ownership of information, (continued)
- Re: [projectvrm] Ownership of information, Mark Lizar, 10/15/2007
- Re: [projectvrm] Ownership of information, Mark Lizar, 10/15/2007
- Re: [projectvrm] Ownership of information, Iain Henderson, 10/29/2007
- Re: [projectvrm] Ownership of information, bernard lunn, 10/29/2007
- Re: [projectvrm] Ownership of information, Iain Henderson, 10/30/2007
- Re: [projectvrm] Ownership of information, Alan Patrick, 10/30/2007
[projectvrm] Why VRM is good for business, Keith Hopper, 10/09/2007
Re: [projectvrm] Microsoft's Personal Health Care Records, Michael Becker, 10/10/2007
Re: [projectvrm] Microsoft's Personal Health Care Records, W.B. McNamara, 10/09/2007
RE: [projectvrm] Microsoft's Personal Health Care Records, Drummond Reed, 10/09/2007
Message not available
- Re: [projectvrm] Microsoft's Personal Health Care Records, Adriana Lukas, 10/08/2007
Re: [projectvrm] Microsoft's Personal Health Care Records, ASMitchell, 10/08/2007
Re: [projectvrm] Microsoft's Personal Health Care Records, ASMitchell, 10/09/2007
Re: [projectvrm] Microsoft's Personal Health Care Records, ASMitchell, 10/10/2007
Re: [projectvrm] Microsoft's Personal Health Care Records, ASMitchell, 10/11/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.