Text archives Help


Re: [projectvrm] Microsoft's Personal Health Care Records


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Adriana Lukas" < >
  • To: "Doc Searls" < >
  • Cc: , ,
  • Subject: Re: [projectvrm] Microsoft's Personal Health Care Records
  • Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:58:54 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=RSHF3u4BC4dOhRXXNug02yZKvSFEw+w3bqgzuAk89VJdGKlYFp5yITWfwZg0cJ18Ae4G5yPiUz/iCpb8jbtFngw0+FBN2ApEGCltg0zfRHNvh+f46H3+eEzKkzVy5qQiNMqaBsQptHVrPN9A5+vT3OAPSeQUo6iopTmEy1Vyp9o=

Ah, just saw Doc's response as I sent mine. Yes, agreed. Will make
that point mercilessly. :)

A

On 08/10/2007, Doc Searls
< >
wrote:
> I agree. No single topic, when I bring up VRM examples, attracts more
> interest, "hits home" harder, cuts across political lines better.
>
> I also think it *is* about buyers and sellers, or individuals and
> organizations.
>
> In fact, I can't think of a better example of a problem that can *only* be
> resolved, ultimately, buy making the individual the "point of integration".
>
> Independence is key. This is where the Microsoft solution -- as I
> understand it so far -- is one more problem. There is nothing wrong with a
> dependency on a provider; but there is plenty wrong with one that cannot be
> severed and re-attached elsewhere without loss of personal data or control
> of it.
>
> Independence is key. Independence is choice. That's what makes markets.
> That's what makes relationships, too.
>
> IMHO, etc.
>
> Doc
>
> At 11:33 AM -0400 10/8/07,
>
> wrote:
> >In my view it is slap-bang central.
> >
> >You could see the VRM space as a series of concentric circles: each with
> >its own technical challenges, business models and opportunities etc.
> >
> >At the core is 'my data', which starts with administrative basics such as
> >name, address etc but very quickly spills out across the whole of my life.
> >So it quickly becomes a series of personal databases: my home, my money,
> >my car, my travel arrangements, my health, my job, etc each of which need
> >to be managed, updated, kept accurate etc if possible without any hassle
> >or effort (!!!)
> >
> >The second ring is the decisions I make relating to these life departments
> >(plus life events such as 'moving home', 'getting married', 'getting
> >divorced', etc). Here the emphasis moves from data gathering, storage,
> >management, access, protection, security, authentication etc to accessing
> >and using information I need to make the best possible decision -
> >including search, comparison, Q&A etc. At this stage the individual is
> >beginning to interact with 'the market', including trading/sharing
> >information with potential suppliers.
> >
> >The third ring is implementation of these decisions: logistics,
> >administration, fulfilment, payment etc.
> >
> >With each of these three rinigs (1) my data 2) my decisions, and 3)
> >implementing my decisions) the underlying personal database is a critical
> >component.
> >
> >One question is, is Microsoft doing this to 'empower' the individual or to
> >create a new monopoly dependence like its operating systems? But that has
> >got nothing to do with the idea itself.
> >
> >Alan
>
>
>


--
The network is always stronger than the node.
http://www.mediainfluencer.net
http://www.bigblogcompany.net
http://www.samizdata.net/blog

Background:
http://www.mediainfluencer.net/about/

Skype: adriana872
UK mobile: +44 787 6757129
US mobile: +1 732 447 5115



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.