Privacy Part 2: The Right to Be Forgotten: Difference between revisions
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==Optional Readings== | ==Optional Readings== | ||
* [http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=152065&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=305802 Gonzalez v. Google (ECJ decisions)] (optional reading, but highly recommended) | |||
==Class Discussion== | ==Class Discussion== | ||
<div style="background-color:#CCCCCC;">Please remember to sign your postings by adding four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) to the end of your contribution. This will automatically add your username and the date/time of your post, like so: [[User:Andy|Andy]] 15:12, 7 November 2013 (EST)</div> | <div style="background-color:#CCCCCC;">Please remember to sign your postings by adding four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) to the end of your contribution. This will automatically add your username and the date/time of your post, like so: [[User:Andy|Andy]] 15:12, 7 November 2013 (EST)</div> |
Revision as of 14:03, 24 January 2015
February 17
The Court of Justice of the European Union made big waves last May when it ruled against Google on a claim brought by a Spanish citizen asserting a right to remove two news articles that appeared in Google search results when he searched for his own name. The case, now known as the case that recognized the “right to be forgotten,” has come to the forefront of discussions of online privacy. In today’s class, we’ll explore the “right to be forgotten,” how it applies in Europe, whether it could ever come to the United States, and how international companies address competing national balances over privacy and free speech.
We’ll also spend part of this day describing the final project for the class, and discuss how to pick a good community and issue to study for the project.
Readings
Optional Readings
- Gonzalez v. Google (ECJ decisions) (optional reading, but highly recommended)