Privacy Part 2: The Right to Be Forgotten: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{ClassCalendar}} '''February 17''' ==Readings== ==Optional Readings== ==Class Discussion== <div style="background-color:#CCCCCC;">Please remember to sign your postings b...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''February 17''' | '''February 17''' | ||
The Court of Justice of the European Union made big waves last May when it ruled against Google on a claim brought by a Spanish citizen asserting a right to remove two news articles that appeared in Google search results when he searched for his own name. The case, now known as the case that recognized the “right to be forgotten,” has come to the forefront of discussions of online privacy. In today’s class, we’ll explore the “right to be forgotten,” how it applies in Europe, whether it could ever come to the United States, and how international companies address competing national balances over privacy and free speech. | |||
We’ll also spend part of this day describing the final project for the class, and discuss how to pick a good community and issue to study for the project. | |||
==Readings== | ==Readings== |
Revision as of 13:46, 21 January 2015
February 17
The Court of Justice of the European Union made big waves last May when it ruled against Google on a claim brought by a Spanish citizen asserting a right to remove two news articles that appeared in Google search results when he searched for his own name. The case, now known as the case that recognized the “right to be forgotten,” has come to the forefront of discussions of online privacy. In today’s class, we’ll explore the “right to be forgotten,” how it applies in Europe, whether it could ever come to the United States, and how international companies address competing national balances over privacy and free speech.
We’ll also spend part of this day describing the final project for the class, and discuss how to pick a good community and issue to study for the project.