New and Old Media, Participation, and Information: Difference between revisions
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
== Links from Class == | == Links from Class == | ||
[[User:Amarquis|Amarquis]] 16:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC) I found this an interesting meta editorial on the topic of New and Old Media, Participation, and Information. In this case it's how media obsession with new technology alone is making customers more powerful. [http://techcrunch.com/2010/02/28/cherchez-la-fame "NSFW: Cherchez la fame – or why the media’s obsession with Twitter campaigns will make customer service smell French"]. As the title indicates, it has a touch of salty language so it may be [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_safe_for_work NSFW] -- Not Safe For Work. | |||
Revision as of 12:45, 28 February 2010
The profusion of low-cost media production and distribution has led to the rise of an alternative citizen-led media sector. Is this a passing fad of enthusiastic amateurs or the beginning of a fundamental restructuring of the way media and news are produced and consumed? Will the current trends lead to more information, better information, and better informed people or to an infinite stream of unreliable chatter? Will it lead to a more politically engaged populace or to an increasingly polarized society that picks its sources of information to match its biases and ignorance?
ASSIGNMENT: Please read the executive summary of the Media Re:public Overview and one additional Media Re:public paper, and the executive summary, conclusions and recommendations of the Knight report. Use those as a jumping off point to explore either of those sets of resources in greater depth. You should delve more deeply into at least a few of the major challenges and possible solutions related to business models, the participation gap, and the changing media ecosystem (which are all broad topics, and can be considered from many perspectives).
Readings
- Media Re:public Overview - Read at least the executive summary
- Knight Commission Report on Information Needs of Communities in a Democracy - Read at least the executive summary, recommendations and conclusions
- Media Re:Public website
- Knight Commission report website
Additional Resources
- Jay Rosen, Open Source Journalism (video)
- We The Media, Dan Gillmor (the Introduction is a good start, so to speak)
- Jay Rosen, Bloggers vs. Journalists Is Over
- Jeff Jarvis
- Shirky on Social Media
Class Discussion
To read about "Disruptive Innovation", check out one of the best explanations (not in the video, but on the page) about it: http://www.claytonchristensen.com/disruptive_innovation.html
Links from Class
Amarquis 16:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC) I found this an interesting meta editorial on the topic of New and Old Media, Participation, and Information. In this case it's how media obsession with new technology alone is making customers more powerful. "NSFW: Cherchez la fame – or why the media’s obsession with Twitter campaigns will make customer service smell French". As the title indicates, it has a touch of salty language so it may be NSFW -- Not Safe For Work.