Copyright in Cyberspace: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* [http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html#512 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) ("Information Residing on Systems or Networks at Direction of Users")] | * [http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html#512 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) ("Information Residing on Systems or Networks at Direction of Users")] | ||
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/19/technology/19youtube.html?pagewanted=1&sq=viacom&st=cse&scp=2 "Viacom Says YouTube Ignored Copyrights" (M. Helft, NY Times, 3/18/2010)] | * [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/19/technology/19youtube.html?pagewanted=1&sq=viacom&st=cse&scp=2 "Viacom Says YouTube Ignored Copyrights" (M. Helft, NY Times, 3/18/2010)] | ||
== Additional Readings (Optional) == | == Additional Readings (Optional) == | ||
* [http://media-cyber.law.harvard.edu/Beyond%20Broadcast%202006/Boyle.mp4 Jamie Boyle, Beyond Broadcast Conference (video)] | * [http://media-cyber.law.harvard.edu/Beyond%20Broadcast%202006/Boyle.mp4 Jamie Boyle, Beyond Broadcast Conference (video)] | ||
* [http://www.law.duke.edu/cspd/comics/digital.html Center for the Study of the Public Domain, Tales from the Public Domain: Bound By Law? (comic)] | * [http://www.law.duke.edu/cspd/comics/digital.html Center for the Study of the Public Domain, Tales from the Public Domain: Bound By Law? (comic)] | ||
* [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/comics1 Creative Commons: A Spectrum of Rights (comic)] | * [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/comics1 Creative Commons: A Spectrum of Rights (comic)] | ||
* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SaFTm2bcac Amen Break Video] | * [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SaFTm2bcac Amen Break Video] | ||
* [http:// | * [http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2589269115679339204&q=410+F.3d+792&hl=en&as_sdt=2002 Bridgeport v. Dimension, 410 F.3d 792 (6th Cir. 2005)] (Secs. I - II, pp. 795 - 805) | ||
* [http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/resources/publications/recut_reframe_recycle/ Center for Social Media, Recut, Reframe, Recyle] (full report optional) | |||
* [http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/resources/publications/recut_reframe_recycle/ Center for Social Media, Recut, Reframe, Recyle] ( | |||
* [http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8647956476676426155&q=545+U.S.+913&hl=en&as_sdt=2002 MGM v. Grokster, 545 U.S. 913 (2005)] (Sec. II, pp. 928 - 937) | * [http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8647956476676426155&q=545+U.S.+913&hl=en&as_sdt=2002 MGM v. Grokster, 545 U.S. 913 (2005)] (Sec. II, pp. 928 - 937) | ||
* [http:// | * [http://www.slate.com/id/2181776/pagenum/all/ "J.K. Rowling Should Lose Her Copyright Lawsuit Against the Harry Potter Lexicon" (T. Wu, Slate, 1/10/2008)] | ||
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/09/nyregion/09potter.html?_r=1 "Rowling Wins Lawsuit Against Potter Lexicon" (J. Eligon, NY Times, 9/8/08)] | |||
* [http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/16/830/index.html New York Times Bits Blog: Mixing It Up Over Remixes and Fair Use] | |||
* [http://www.cnet.com/8301-13739_1-9854309-46.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20 CNET, Did Slate Violate Copyright Law] (watch linked-to video too) | |||
* [http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/biguploads/Fairey_v_AP_complaint_with_exhibits.pdf Fairey v. AP (SDNY Civ. Action No. 09-01123), Fairey Complaint] (Pars. 9 - 40, pp. 2 - 10) | * [http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/biguploads/Fairey_v_AP_complaint_with_exhibits.pdf Fairey v. AP (SDNY Civ. Action No. 09-01123), Fairey Complaint] (Pars. 9 - 40, pp. 2 - 10) | ||
* [http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2009cv01123/340121/13/ Fairey v. AP (SDNY Civ. Action No. 09-01123), AP Answer and Counterclaims] (Pars. 73 - 162, pp. 16 - 49) | * [http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2009cv01123/340121/13/ Fairey v. AP (SDNY Civ. Action No. 09-01123), AP Answer and Counterclaims] (Pars. 73 - 162, pp. 16 - 49) | ||
* [http://www.chillingeffects.org/ Chilling Effects Clearinghouse] | |||
* [http://wendy.seltzer.org/media/sacked-by-copyright.pdf Wendy Seltzer, Sacked By Copyright] | |||
* [http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog-bak/archives/DMCA.html Wendy Seltzer's Blog, NFL Saga] | |||
* [http://www.eff.org/files/20030926_unsafe_harbors.pdf EFF, Unsafe Harbors: Abusive DMCA Subpoenas and Takedown Demands] | |||
* [http://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/lichtman-you-tube/index.html Douglas Lichtman, The Case Against YouTube] | |||
== Class Resources == | == Class Resources == | ||
Revision as of 21:17, 25 March 2010
The Internet has enabled individuals to become involved in the production of media and to distribute these contributions widely at a very low cost. The former bastion of the entertainment industry is opening up to what many are calling a democratization of culture. The copyright doctrine of fair use seemingly bolsters the right to "recut, reframe, and recycle" previous works, but the protection fair use gives to those re-purposing copyrighted material is notoriously uncertain.
Digital and file-sharing technologies also spawned the proliferation of sharing of media and music, threatening to turn the copyright regime on its head. This has led to a number of controversial legal and technological strategies to put the genie back in the bottle. The "notice-and-takedown" provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) allow internet service providers to limit their liability for the copyright infringements of their users if they expeditiously remove material in response to complaints from copyright owners. The DMCA provides for counter-notice and "put-back" of removed material, but many argue that the statutory mechanism is biased in favor of copyright owners and chills innovative, constitutionally protected speech.
This class takes up some of the issues swirling around copyright in cyberspace.
Required Readings
- U.S. Copyright Office, Copyright Basics
- Newton v. Diamond, 204 F.Supp.2d 1244 (C.D. Cal. 2002) (Secs. I - IV(a), pp. 1246 - 1259) (9th Circuit Decision Optional)
- 17 U.S.C. § 107 ("Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use")
- Lawrence Lessig, Free Culture (pp. 1-20)
- 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) ("Information Residing on Systems or Networks at Direction of Users")
- "Viacom Says YouTube Ignored Copyrights" (M. Helft, NY Times, 3/18/2010)
Additional Readings (Optional)
- Jamie Boyle, Beyond Broadcast Conference (video)
- Center for the Study of the Public Domain, Tales from the Public Domain: Bound By Law? (comic)
- Creative Commons: A Spectrum of Rights (comic)
- Amen Break Video
- Bridgeport v. Dimension, 410 F.3d 792 (6th Cir. 2005) (Secs. I - II, pp. 795 - 805)
- Center for Social Media, Recut, Reframe, Recyle (full report optional)
- MGM v. Grokster, 545 U.S. 913 (2005) (Sec. II, pp. 928 - 937)
- "J.K. Rowling Should Lose Her Copyright Lawsuit Against the Harry Potter Lexicon" (T. Wu, Slate, 1/10/2008)
- "Rowling Wins Lawsuit Against Potter Lexicon" (J. Eligon, NY Times, 9/8/08)
- New York Times Bits Blog: Mixing It Up Over Remixes and Fair Use
- CNET, Did Slate Violate Copyright Law (watch linked-to video too)
- Fairey v. AP (SDNY Civ. Action No. 09-01123), Fairey Complaint (Pars. 9 - 40, pp. 2 - 10)
- Fairey v. AP (SDNY Civ. Action No. 09-01123), AP Answer and Counterclaims (Pars. 73 - 162, pp. 16 - 49)
- Chilling Effects Clearinghouse
- Wendy Seltzer, Sacked By Copyright
- Wendy Seltzer's Blog, NFL Saga
- EFF, Unsafe Harbors: Abusive DMCA Subpoenas and Takedown Demands
- Douglas Lichtman, The Case Against YouTube