Control and Code: Privacy Online: Difference between revisions

From Technologies of Politics and Control
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
|  
|  
* [[Regulating Speech Online|Mar 20]]
* [[Regulating Speech Online|Mar 20]]
* [[Internet Infrastructure and Regulation|Mar 22]]
* [[Internet Infrastructure and Regulation|Mar 27]]
* [[Copyright in Cyberspace|Apr 3]]
* [[Copyright in Cyberspace|Apr 3]]
* [[Control and Code: Privacy Online|Apr 10]]  
* [[Control and Code: Privacy Online|Apr 10]]  

Revision as of 20:40, 17 November 2011

April 10

Code is law; the architecture of the Internet and the software that runs on it will determine to a large extent how the Net is regulated in a way that goes far deeper than legal means could ever achieve (or at least ever achieve alone). Technological advances have also produced many tempting options for regulation and surveillance that may severely alter the balance of privacy, access to information and sharing of intellectual property. By regulating behavior, technological architectures or codes embed different values and political choices. Yet code is often treated as a technocratic affair, or something best left to private economic actors pursuing their own interests. If code is law, then control of code is power. If important questions of social ordering are at stake, shouldn't the design and development of code be brought within the political process? In this class we delve into the technological alternatives that will shape interactions over the Internet, as well as the implications of each on personal freedom, privacy and combating cyber-crime.



Readings

Optional Readings


Class Discussion

Links