Frameworks For Studying The Web: Difference between revisions
(→Links) |
(→Links) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
== Class Discussion == | == Class Discussion == | ||
Although Wikipedia offers knowledge on extensive topics, holding the better model, is there not a huge concern that there is no longer postings of validated facts versus mere opinion? | |||
== Links == | == Links == | ||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Citizendium Citizendium] | [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Citizendium Citizendium] | ||
select wikipedia dust-ups: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_biography_controversy Seigenthaler controversy] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essjay_controversy Essjay controversy] | |||
Jason Scott on [http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/808 The Great Failure of Wikipedia] | |||
BBC Virtual Revolution [http://www.bbc.co.uk/virtualrevolution/index.shtml] | |||
--[[User:Rchopra|Rchopra]] 19:57, 1 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
Latest revision as of 14:57, 1 March 2010
Before we can even begin exploring the who's, what's, and why's -- we need to answer the critical question of how. Indeed, the phrase "studying the web" could embrace a staggering world of possible routes to explore, even before beginning to examine its relationship with society and culture. We need something to guide us through this massive field of (very interesting!) foxholes, and link the ideas we encounter into a consistent piece. We need some kind of structure to allow us to understand what we are looking at, the same way a chemist thinks of things in terms of atoms and molecules, or a philosopher can think about things in terms of schools of thought.
This class will propose and develop one framework for the web, which will structure both the discussion and topic matter covered in the course, as well as the methodology that you should apply to your assignments.
Readings
Yochai Benkler, The Wealth of Networks Read pages 379-396 (the rest of this chapter expands the discussions of each layer in more detail, if you want to read more about them)
John Perry Barlow, A Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace
Chris Locke, Doc Searls & David Weinberger, Cluetrain Manifesto (just the manifesto)
Optional Readings
Jack Goldsmith & Tim Wu, Digital Borders
Jonathan Zittrain, The Future of the Internet - Chapters 1 & 2
Videos Watched in Class
Class Discussion
Although Wikipedia offers knowledge on extensive topics, holding the better model, is there not a huge concern that there is no longer postings of validated facts versus mere opinion?
Links
for people interested in a more technical primer on the architecture of the web, how email works, etc. check out ethan zuckerman and andrew mclaughlin's Introduction to Internet Architecture and Institutions
some fred turner resources: video presentation, audio presentation, and homepage
select wikipedia dust-ups: Seigenthaler controversy and Essjay controversy
Jason Scott on The Great Failure of Wikipedia
BBC Virtual Revolution [1] --Rchopra 19:57, 1 March 2010 (UTC)