Assignment 4 Peer Review: Difference between revisions

From Technologies of Politics and Control
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (answer to Brandon)
(Replaced content with "If you'd like to receive or give feedback from/to other students on your rough drafts, please submit them here. ----")
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


----
----
Brandon A. Ceranowicz
Draft 2.2:
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/is2011/Image:A_Comparative_Study_of_Open_Source_Licenses_v2.2.doc
Slightly more professional than the last draft... would appreciate any feedback! Theoretical framework and conclusions still to go - these will be in draft 3.0.
[[User:BrandonAndrzej|BrandonAndrzej]] 16:18, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Brandon A. Ceranowicz
Draft 2.5:
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/is2011/Image:A_Comparative_Study_of_Open_Source_Licenses_v2.5.doc
Conclusion is live! Take a look. Theoretical framework still to come.
[[User:BrandonAndrzej|BrandonAndrzej]] 23:14, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
In this paper, Brandon skillfully guides a detailed tour of open source licenses. The composition's robust structure ably contains the fine points of the subject matter. There is enough information here for several projects. One possible new work would be a more generalized overview of open source licenses for the layman. Even in the paper's current format, a summary table comparing the basic aspects of the individual licenses would be useful. --[[User:SCL|SCL]] 18:07, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your excellent advice! I have incorporated a visual representation of license content into the next draft.[[User:BrandonAndrzej|BrandonAndrzej]] 01:25, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Brandon A. Ceranowicz
Draft 3.0:
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/is2011/Image:A_Comparative_Study_of_Open_Source_Licenses_v3.0.doc
Theoretical framework is up; barring any major errors, this should be the final draft of the long form version - now I have to condense it into 10 pages... suggestions very much appreciated!
Brandon A. Cernaowicz
Final Draft (long version)
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/is2011/Image:A_Comparative_Study_of_Open_Source_Licenses.doc
This is the completed long version. Abridged version to follow shortly.
Brandon A. Ceranowicz
Draft 1.0 (short version)
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/is2011/Image:A_Comparative_Study_of_Open_Source_Licenses_%28short%29_v1.0.doc
This is a rough draft of the abridged version. The sourcing needs to be completely redone. (Also still a little long...)[[User:BrandonAndrzej|BrandonAndrzej]] 18:31, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Brandon A. Ceranowicz
Draft 1.1 (short)
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/is2011/Image:A_Comparative_Study_of_Open_Source_Licenses_%28short%29_v1.1.doc
Sourcing fixed. This should be the final product, barring any feedback.
- [[User:BrandonAndrzej|BrandonAndrzej]] 23:18, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Onyema Ajuogu: [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/is2011/sites/is2011/images/Internet_infiltration_to_Nigeria_burden_of_cybercrime_to_ecommerce_assign-4.pdf  Internet infiltration to Nigeria:  burden of cyber-crime to e-commerce]
Onyema, this is a very interesting topic, but I would suggest for an academic paper you need to footnote in your paper information you have found from third party sources.  Although you have original ideas, it gives  your paper credibility to cite third party information you have used to develop the conclusions in your paper. [[[[User:Sjennings|sjennings]] 16:39, 5 May 2011 (UTC)]]
Onyema , All in all very interesting paper.  May I suggest that you elaborate about the problems you refer to when you say, “SAT3 submarine cable system that is connecting Africa to India( of which both have had a significant problems).” Do you mean technology, social, political …? I suggest you be more explicit which will help as you lay out your arguments later in the paper.
Also, I saw a typo in your title, “The role National Law is plying.” I think you want “Playing.”
Thanks for the early preview. --[[User:Gclinch|Gclinch]] 20:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Name: Guy
Title: The Transition to Next Generation 9-1-1 in North America
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/is2011/sites/is2011/images/The_Transition_to_Next_Generation_9-1-1_in_North_America_%28draft_May_6%29.pdf Link:]
Note: I am still working on my conclusions and I need to clean up endnotes, references etc.. I'll appreciate any comments. Thanks TGIF! --[[User:Gclinch|Gclinch]] 23:17, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Getting closer. [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/is2011/sites/is2011/images/The_Transition_to_Next_Generation_9-1-1_in_North_America_%28draft_May_7%29.pdf Click here for May 7] version of my paper.
Good Luck everybody. --[[User:Gclinch|Gclinch]] 20:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
-- Guy: Of negligable importance, I know, but don't you find the roman numerals to be a bit unwieldy? - [[User:BrandonAndrzej|BrandonAndrzej]] 23:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
--Brandon. Thank you. Yes. A friend of mine likes to say that, “if you want to seem smart, use Latin in your presentations.”  ;- ) Not so in footnote numbering, they are just a pain. I've switched to regular numerals and improved my paper. Thanks! --[[User:Gclinch|Gclinch]] 19:32, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:04, 24 January 2013

If you'd like to receive or give feedback from/to other students on your rough drafts, please submit them here.

Retrieved from "http://cyber.harvard.edu/is2013/?title=Assignment_4_Peer_Review&oldid=9268"