Control and Code: Privacy Online: Difference between revisions

From Technologies of Politics and Control
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
* [https://www.socialtext.net/codev2/privacy Lawrence Lessig, Code 2.0: Privacy]
* [https://www.socialtext.net/codev2/privacy Lawrence Lessig, Code 2.0: Privacy]
* http://paranoia.dubfire.net/2009/12/8-million-reasons-for-real-surveillance.html
* http://paranoia.dubfire.net/2009/12/8-million-reasons-for-real-surveillance.html
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/26/business/media/26privacy.html Noam Cohen, It’s Tracking Your Every Move and You May Not Even Know (NYTimes, March 26, 2011)]
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_flesh_search_engine
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_flesh_search_engine
</onlyinclude>
</onlyinclude>

Revision as of 14:07, 26 March 2012

April 3

Code is law; the architecture of the Internet and the software that runs on it will determine to a large extent how the Net is regulated in a way that goes far deeper than legal means could ever achieve (or at least ever achieve alone). Technological advances have also produced many tempting options for regulation and surveillance that may severely alter the balance of privacy, access to information and sharing of intellectual property. By regulating behavior, technological architectures or codes embed different values and political choices. Yet code is often treated as a technocratic affair, or something best left to private economic actors pursuing their own interests. If code is law, then control of code is power. If important questions of social ordering are at stake, shouldn't the design and development of code be brought within the political process? In this class we delve into the technological alternatives that will shape interactions over the Internet, as well as the implications of each on personal freedom, privacy and combating cyber-crime.



Readings

Optional Readings


Class Discussion

April 3: Control and Code: Privacy Online Just Johnny 17:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Links