Politics and Technology of Control: Introduction

The Net has great potential for “good” (e.g. innovation, economic growth, education, and access to information), and is likewise is a great platform for the bawdy, tawdry and illegal. Is this platform about fundamental social, political and economic change, or about easier access to pornography, cheap pharmaceuticals, free music and poker at home? This question leads us to a host of interesting issues that weave their way through the course related to openness, access, regulatory control, free speech, anonymity, intellectual property rights, democracy, transparency, norms and values, economic and cultural change and cyber-terrorism, as well as scamsters and thieves.

Preparation (Assignment "Zero")

To frame the issues we will be talking about in this class and to get the discussion going, we'll start with the recent controversy involving Wikileaks. Take some time to read through the articles below. Come to class prepared to answer the following questions and to pose some questions of your own.

• What is Wikileaks? Is it a journalism organization? A terrorist organization? A criminal syndicate?
• Do we need an organization like Wikileaks?
• What kind of arguments or ideological stands would you make to support your position one way or the other?
• What was the U.S.'s (and the world's) response to Wikileaks' disclosure of diplomatic cables?
• What are the legal and/or free speech implications involved in this decision by Amazon to stop hosting the Wikileaks site?
• What do you feel these articles show about the nature of the Internet?

Readings

• MIT Technology Review: Everything You Need to Know About Wikileaks
• Wall Street Journal: To Publish Leaks Or Not to Publish?
• Salon: Online, the censors are scoring big wins
• GigaOm: Like It or Not, WikiLeaks is a Media Entity
• Guardian: Live with the WikiLeakable world or shut down the net. It's your choice

Optional Readings

• EFF: Amazon and WikiLeaks - Online Speech is Only as Strong as the Weakest Intermediary
• Wired: Lieberman Introduces Anti-WikiLeaks Legislation
• Salon: WikiLeaks reveals more than just government secrets
• Clay Shirky: Wikileaks and the Long Haul
• Citizen Media Law Project: Julius Baer Bank and Trust v. Wikileaks
• MediaBerkman: Wikileaks and the Information Wars
• Coverage of the cables themselves by the NYT [1], Guardian [2], Der Spiegel [3]

Class Discussion

Please use this space for comments/discussion you would like to share with the rest of the class.

I've added an interesting article by Jay Rosen in which he names WikiLeaks as "the World’s First Stateless News Organization". So if that is true, the problem seems to be just a good old Witch-hunt. And the White House acts like a youngster who just haven't learned how to listen yet. It's the year 2008 yet again, human reaction to a new and unknown normally fears us. After reading all that am i wrong to say out loud WikiLeaks really didn't put anyone in danger by publishing these materials? They did censored all the important spy stuff, didn't they?--Jastify 15:08, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Other Useful Links

• The World's First Stateless News Organization